Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
In a move aimed at solidifying its reputation as a global financial hub, Hong Kong has unveiled plans to exempt private equity funds, hedge funds, and ultra-high-net-worth investment vehicles from taxes on cryptocurrency gains.
This initiative is part of a broader strategy to attract international investors and financial activity to the region, positioning itself as a leader in digital finance.
But what exactly does this mean for the crypto industry, and why is Hong Kong making this bold move?
The proposed exemption targets gains made by private equity funds, hedge funds, and other sophisticated investment vehicles.
These entities would no longer be taxed on gains from cryptocurrency transactions.
This represents a significant shift from previous policies, which treated such gains as taxable income.
The exemption would apply not just to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum but also to other digital assets, including tokenised securities.
This broader scope demonstrates Hong Kong’s recognition of the evolving landscape of digital finance.
Hong Kong’s decision comes at a time when global competition for digital finance leadership is intensifying.
Other jurisdictions, like Singapore and Dubai, have implemented similar tax-friendly policies to lure crypto businesses.
Hong Kong’s government appears keen to ensure that it doesn’t lose ground in this competitive space.
The exemption is also likely a response to concerns from the financial industry, which argued that taxing crypto gains discouraged innovation and investment.
By eliminating these taxes, Hong Kong is sending a clear signal that it is open for business in the rapidly growing digital finance sector.
For international investors and fund managers, this exemption could make Hong Kong an attractive destination for crypto-related investments.
It simplifies tax compliance and increases potential returns, making it easier for funds to include cryptocurrencies and digital assets in their portfolios.
While the exemption is promising, there are questions about its long-term impact.
Will it attract speculative behavior?
And how will it interact with Hong Kong’s broader regulatory framework, especially as global standards on crypto regulation evolve?
Hong Kong’s proposed crypto tax exemptions mark a significant step in its effort to become a global leader in digital finance.
By creating a tax-friendly environment for cryptocurrencies, the city-state is making a bold play for international investment and innovation.
If you have any queries about this article on crypto tax exemptions, or tax matters in Hong Kong, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Hong Kong and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
The Beckham Law, officially known as Spain’s “Special Regime for Posted Workers,” has been gaining attention for its significant tax benefits to expatriates moving to Spain for work.
Designed to attract high-skilled professionals, remote workers, and investors, this regime offers eligible individuals the opportunity to pay a flat income tax rate of 24% instead of the progressive rates of up to 47% typically applied in Spain.
With recent updates introduced by the Spanish government, the Beckham Law has become even more accessible, making Spain an attractive destination for global talent.
Originally introduced to encourage foreign footballers to play in Spain (hence the nickname), the Beckham Law allows expatriates to maintain non-resident tax status for six years while residing in Spain. This means:
In 2024, the Spanish government implemented several changes to broaden the scope of the regime:
Previously, applicants had to prove they hadn’t been a tax resident in Spain for 10 years. This has now been reduced to 5 years, making it easier for professionals to qualify
The Beckham Law now covers:
Spouses and dependent children under 25 (or disabled family members) can benefit from the regime, provided they relocate during the taxpayer’s first year in Spain. However, this extension is limited if the family’s total savings income exceeds the taxpayer’s taxable base.
Employment income received in kind (e.g., housing or other non-cash benefits) is now tax-exempt under the regime, aligning with the treatment of Spanish residents.
To qualify for the Beckham Law, applicants must meet the following conditions:
Excluded groups include freelancers without special visas, athletes, and directors of passive holding companies.
Applying for the Beckham Law involves submitting documentation to Spain’s Tax Agency within six months of registering with Spanish Social Security. Required documents include:
While the Beckham Law offers substantial tax advantages, it comes with certain limitations. For example:
The Beckham Law remains a cornerstone of Spain’s efforts to attract international talent, particularly in the post-pandemic era, where remote work and global mobility have become more common.
Recent updates make it easier for expatriates, digital nomads, and entrepreneurs to benefit from Spain’s vibrant culture, high quality of life, and favorable tax regime.
However, potential applicants should carefully assess the implications of Spain’s Solidarity Tax and consult professionals to ensure full compliance and maximum benefit.
If you have any queries about this article on the Beckham Law or tax matters in Spain, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Spain and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) has issued Ministerial Decision No. 261 of 2024 (MD261) concerning Unincorporated Partnerships, Foreign Partnerships, and Family Foundations.
MD261 repeals the earlier Ministerial Decision No. 127 of 2023 and applies retrospectively from 1 June 2023.
This article highlights the key amendments introduced by MD261 and their implications.
Under Article 5(2) of MD261, juridical persons wholly owned and controlled by Family Foundations treated as Unincorporated Partnerships may now apply to the Federal Tax Authority (FTA) for the same tax-transparent status, provided the following conditions are met:
This amendment provides greater flexibility for Family Foundations in structuring their ownership and tax arrangements.
Article 3 of MD261 revises the notification requirements for Unincorporated Partnerships treated as Taxable Persons under the CT Law:
This amendment simplifies compliance for Unincorporated Partnerships, reducing the administrative burden of immediate notifications.
MD261 also introduces changes regarding the classification of foreign partnerships as Unincorporated Partnerships under the CT Law.
These amendments refine the conditions under which foreign partnerships may elect for tax transparency, ensuring consistency with the updated provisions.
Ministerial Decision No. 261 of 2024 introduces meaningful changes for Family Foundations, Unincorporated Partnerships, and Foreign Partnerships, providing greater clarity and flexibility under the UAE’s corporate tax framework.
These amendments reduce compliance burdens and enhance tax structuring options for eligible entities.
If you have any queries about this article on Unincorporated (and foreign) Partnerships & Family Foundations or tax matters in the UAE more generally, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UAE and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) is a tax transparency measure introduced by the OECD as part of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative.
CbCR requires large multinational companies to report detailed information about their operations, profits, and taxes paid in each country where they do business.
This information is then shared with tax authorities to help them detect tax avoidance practices, such as profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.
CbCR applies to multinational companies with global revenues of more than €750 million.
These companies must file an annual CbCR report that provides a breakdown of their income, profits, taxes paid, and other economic activities in each country where they operate.
For example, if a company has subsidiaries in 10 different countries, it must provide information on how much revenue each subsidiary earns, how much profit it makes, and how much tax it pays in each country.
This level of detail helps tax authorities identify where a company might be shifting profits to avoid taxes.
as introduced as part of the OECD’s effort to tackle tax avoidance by multinational companies.
Before CbCR, it was difficult for tax authorities to see the full picture of a company’s global operations.
By requiring companies to disclose their activities on a country-by-country basis, CbCR gives tax authorities the information they need to detect tax avoidance schemes.
This reporting helps ensure that multinational companies are paying their fair share of taxes in the countries where they actually do business, rather than shifting profits to tax havens.
Country-by-Country Reporting is a critical tool for improving tax transparency and combating tax avoidance.
By requiring large multinational companies to report detailed information about their global operations,
CbCR helps tax authorities ensure that companies are paying their fair share of taxes and operating in a fair and transparent manner.
If you have any queries about this article – What is country by country reporting? – then please do get in touch.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) have provided unprecedented financial support for climate change initiatives, spanning battery manufacturing, critical minerals development, carbon capture, methane control, and industrial decarbonization.
Since 2022, the US Department of Energy (DOE) has consistently issued funding opportunities and awarded grants to advance the Biden Administration’s climate goals, fostering U.S. clean energy innovation and domestic manufacturing.
The IRA has also bolstered the DOE loan guarantee program.
However, as the Trump Administration takes office, questions arise regarding the fate of these awards and loan guarantees.
Some IRA tax credits face the possibility of repeal by Congress.
Similarly, Congress may decide to rescind funding allocated to unexecuted financial assistance awards.
However, agreements that have already been executed, along with finalized loan guarantees, are likely to remain intact, even amid a shift in policy priorities.
During President Trump’s first term, the DOE Loan Programs Office (LPO) did not close a single loan guarantee, despite being funded.
Applications currently under consideration that fail to close before the inauguration could face a similar fate.
However, there are indications this pattern may differ under the new Trump Administration:
Applicants must advocate early and clearly for their projects to avoid potential elimination of the program, which could be framed as part of the “Green New Deal” that President Trump campaigned against.
The DOE has already awarded tens of billions of dollars in funding to various decarbonization efforts under the IRA and IIJA.
While the agreements include standard termination clauses allowing the government to end them if they no longer align with program goals, such terminations would need to reference the original appropriations statutes.
The IRA and IIJA explicitly define the purposes of the awards, and the DOE has adhered to these legislative directives.
Consequently, attempts by the new administration to revoke completed awards would likely face legal challenges and have limited chances of success.
Unexecuted awards and open funding opportunities face significant risks under the new administration.
After the inauguration, there will likely be a temporary freeze on financial assistance awards still under negotiation and announced funding opportunities.
DOE career staff may delay further action until receiving directives from new leadership.
Nonetheless, prolonged inaction could lead to legal challenges from applicants.
Additionally, the Republican-controlled Congress might opt to withdraw previously appropriated funds to redirect the budget toward new priorities, such as tax cuts.
For applicants who have not yet been selected for awards, prospects for success are likely to diminish significantly.
Those who have been selected but have yet to finalize negotiations should prioritize completing them as soon as possible, as DOE’s current leadership is likely working to finalize agreements before the administration change takes effect.
While executed financial assistance agreements and loan guarantees appear secure, pending applications and unexecuted awards face uncertainty under the Trump Administration.
Applicants must act swiftly to complete negotiations or risk losing out as policy priorities shift.
If you have any queries about this article on the IRA and IIJA or tax matters in the US, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the U.S. and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
As businesses adapt to the UAE’s Corporate Tax framework, attention is now turning to ensuring compliance with tax filing requirements.
One critical element is the preparation and submission of the Transfer Pricing Disclosure Form (“TP Form”) as part of the Corporate Tax Return.
The TP Form requires taxpayers to disclose transactions with Related Parties and/or Connected Persons.
To comply with UAE regulations, businesses must align their transfer pricing practices with the arm’s length principle before the close of the financial year to avoid discrepancies.
This article provides an overview of the TP Form’s requirements and highlights key issues UAE corporate taxpayers should consider to meet their compliance obligations.
The TP Form is a mandatory disclosure document under the UAE transfer pricing rules.
It must be submitted alongside the annual Corporate Tax Return no later than nine months after the end of the relevant tax period.
Taxpayers are required to:
The TP Form serves as a self-assessment tool, placing the responsibility on taxpayers to confirm compliance with the arm’s length principle.
Businesses should review their transactions during the financial year and make any necessary transfer pricing adjustments to ensure accurate reporting.
As the financial year draws to a close, businesses should assess whether their internal processes and documentation meet UAE requirements and support the values reported in the TP Form.
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has provided additional details about the TP Form, which reveal several considerations for UAE taxpayers:
With limited time remaining in the financial year, businesses should take the following steps to ensure compliance:
Compliance with UAE Transfer Pricing Disclosure requirements is essential for all corporate taxpayers.
A good understanding of the TP Form should mean that businesses can avoid potential penalties and ensure smooth filing of their Corporate Tax Return.
If you have any queries about this article on UAE transfer pricing rules or tax matters in the UAE, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UAE and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
The OECD has published new technical guidelines to assist countries in implementing the global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%.
This initiative aims to ensure that multinational corporations contribute a fair share of taxes, regardless of where they operate.
The technical guidance addresses several challenges, including calculating effective tax rates, identifying low-tax jurisdictions, and handling cross-border complexities.
It also provides a framework for dispute resolution between nations.
The guidelines will require multinationals to reassess their tax strategies, particularly those involving low-tax jurisdictions.
Compliance costs are expected to rise, but the rules aim to create a more level playing field globally.
Countries with tax-friendly regimes may resist adopting these guidelines, fearing a loss of competitiveness.
Additionally, differing interpretations of the rules could lead to disputes between jurisdictions.
The OECD’s technical guidance is a significant step towards implementing a global minimum tax. While challenges remain, this initiative represents a milestone in international tax cooperation.
If you have any queries about this article on OECD’s global minimum tax guidelines, or tax matters in OECD member states, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in OECD member states and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
On October 15, 2024, the UAE Ministry of Finance officially announced the cancellation of the Economic Substance Regulations (ESR).
This significant development follows the introduction of the Federal Corporate Tax (CT) Law and marks a pivotal shift in the regulatory landscape for businesses operating in the UAE.
The cancellation was formalised through Cabinet Resolution No. (98) of 2024, which amends the earlier provisions of Cabinet Resolution No. (57) of 2020 on Economic Substance Requirements.
This article explores the background, implications, and key provisions of the latest resolution.
The Economic Substance Regulations were initially introduced on April 30, 2019, through Cabinet Resolution No. 31 of 2019, as part of the UAE’s commitment to the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS and to address the EU’s concerns about the UAE’s tax framework.
This move aimed to ensure that the UAE was removed from the EU’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (EU Blacklist), which occurred on October 10, 2019.
The regulations required UAE onshore and free zone companies conducting specific “Relevant Activities” to meet an Economic Substance Test by maintaining sufficient substance in the UAE.
However, with the advent of the Federal CT Law, the relevance of ESR has diminished, leading to its eventual withdrawal.
The new resolution limits the applicability of ESR to fiscal years beginning January 1, 2019, and ending December 31, 2022.
For financial years commencing after December 31, 2022, UAE entities are no longer required to comply with ESR obligations, including filing notifications or reports.
Penalties imposed for non-compliance with ESR obligations for financial years beginning after December 31, 2022, have been revoked.
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) will refund fines already paid, and procedures for claiming these refunds are expected to be announced soon.
Although ESR obligations have ended for financial years after December 31, 2022, businesses must retain documentation for ESR submissions made during the effective period (2019–2022).
The FTA continues to audit filings for this period, and entities should be prepared for such reviews.
With the cessation of ESR, businesses can now direct their focus toward compliance with the UAE CT Law.
Clarifications on administrative procedures for penalties and filings related to the post-ESR period are anticipated.
Entities that have paid fines or filed appeals for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2022, can seek refunds and expect the resolution of their grievances.
Businesses should monitor updates from the FTA on refund procedures.
For the ESR period (2019–2022), entities should maintain proper records of filings and ensure readiness for potential audits.
The cancellation of ESR signifies a shift in the UAE’s approach to economic regulation, reflecting the evolving tax framework under the UAE CT Law.
Businesses must align their operations with the new regulatory requirements while addressing any residual ESR obligations for the 2019–2022 period.
If you have any queries about this article on the UAE Ministry of Finance’s cancellation of Economic Substance Regulations or tax matters in the UAE, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UAE and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
President-elect Donald Trump has announced plans to impose significant tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Citing concerns over illegal immigration and drug trafficking, particularly fentanyl, these measures aim to address national security issues.
However, they also raise questions about potential economic repercussions and international relations.
The proposed tariffs include a 25% tax on all products imported from Canada and Mexico, and an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods.
These measures are intended to pressure these countries into taking more stringent actions against illegal activities affecting the US.
The tariffs are set to be implemented through executive orders upon Trump’s inauguration.
Mexico and Canada have expressed concerns over the proposed tariffs.
Mexican President Sheinbaum warned of possible retaliation and emphasized the need for negotiations to avoid a trade war.
Canadian officials highlighted their ongoing efforts against drug trafficking and expressed a desire to maintain strong trade relations.
China, on the other hand, suggested the mutual benefits of trade cooperation and denounced the threat of a trade war.
Economists warn that such tariffs could disrupt existing trade agreements, lead to higher consumer prices, and negatively impact industries reliant on cross-border supply chains.
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) could be particularly affected, potentially leading to inflation and economic instability.
The proposed tariffs represent a strategic move to address national security concerns but carry significant economic risks.
Balancing these factors will be crucial in determining the overall impact of these measures on the U.S. economy and its international relationships.
If you have any queries about this article on US tariff threats, or tax matters in the United States, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, there is more information on membership here.
The OECD has introduced a new Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) designed to enhance transparency and combat tax evasion in the cryptocurrency market.
This framework represents a significant step forward in addressing the tax challenges posed by digital assets.
The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework requires crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and other intermediaries to report transactions and account balances to tax authorities.
This information will then be shared among jurisdictions through the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard.
Crypto users in participating jurisdictions will face increased scrutiny of their transactions.
This may lead to higher compliance costs but is expected to reduce the misuse of cryptocurrencies for tax evasion and other illicit activities.
The CARF aims to standardise the treatment of crypto assets across jurisdictions, making it easier for governments to track and tax digital transactions.
However, countries with lax regulations may still pose challenges to enforcement.
The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is a game-changer for the regulation of digital assets.
While it may create additional burdens for crypto users and businesses, its long-term benefits for transparency and tax compliance are undeniable.
If you have any queries about this article on OECD’s crypto reporting framework, or tax matters in crypto-friendly jurisdictions, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in crypto-friendly jurisdictions and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.