Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
In an era of increasing global tax transparency, businesses must navigate evolving disclosure standards to maintain compliance and uphold their reputations.
Recent developments highlight significant changes, including the European Union’s public Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting directive, Romania’s early adoption of this directive, and the United States’ new tax disclosure standards.
The EU’s public CbC reporting directive mandates that multinational enterprises (MNEs) with consolidated revenues exceeding €750 million disclose specific tax-related information on a country-by-country basis.
This initiative aims to enhance transparency and allow public scrutiny of MNEs’ tax practices.
The directive requires the disclosure of data such as revenue, profit before tax, income tax paid and accrued, number of employees, and the nature of activities in each EU member state and certain non-cooperative jurisdictions.
Romania has proactively implemented the EU’s public CbC reporting directive ahead of other member states.
This early adoption reflects Romania’s commitment to tax transparency and positions it as a leader in implementing EU tax directives.
Romanian entities meeting the revenue threshold must comply with these reporting requirements, necessitating adjustments to their financial reporting processes to ensure accurate and timely disclosures.
In the United States, new tax disclosure standards have emerged, influenced by the global shift towards public CbC reporting.
While the US has not adopted public CbC reporting, it has introduced regulations requiring certain tax disclosures to enhance transparency.
These standards focus on providing stakeholders with a clearer understanding of a company’s tax position and strategies, aligning with the global trend of increased tax transparency.
The global movement towards greater tax transparency is driven by efforts to combat tax avoidance and ensure that MNEs pay their fair share of taxes in the jurisdictions where they operate.
This shift is evident in various international initiatives, including the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, which aims to address tax avoidance strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules.
To navigate these evolving tax disclosure requirements, companies should develop cohesive global tax transparency strategies. Key steps include:
By proactively addressing these requirements, companies can mitigate risks and align with the global trend towards transparency in tax matters.
The landscape of tax disclosure is rapidly evolving, with significant implications for multinational enterprises.
Understanding and adapting to new standards, such as the EU’s public CbC reporting directive and the US’s enhanced disclosure requirements, is crucial.
By developing comprehensive compliance strategies, businesses can navigate these changes effectively, ensuring transparency and maintaining stakeholder trust.
If you have any queries about this article on this article, or tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Transfer pricing refers to the rules and methods used to determine the prices of transactions between related companies, such as subsidiaries of a multinational corporation.
When one subsidiary of a company sells goods or services to another subsidiary, the price at which this transaction occurs is called the transfer price.
These rules exist to ensure that companies price these transactions fairly and in line with the arm’s length principle, meaning the prices should be similar to what independent companies would charge each other.
Transfer pricing is important because it affects how much tax a company pays in each country where it operates.
If a company sets its transfer prices too low or too high, it can shift profits from high-tax countries to low-tax countries, reducing its overall tax bill.
This practice can lead to base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), where countries lose tax revenue because profits are moved to tax havens.
Governments and tax authorities around the world use transfer pricing rules to prevent this type of tax avoidance and ensure that companies pay their fair share of taxes.
Let’s say a multinational company has a subsidiary in Country A, where the tax rate is high, and another subsidiary in Country B, where the tax rate is low.
The company might try to shift its profits to Country B by setting a low transfer price for goods or services sold from the subsidiary in Country A to the subsidiary in Country B.
This would reduce the profits reported in Country A (where the taxes are high) and increase the profits in Country B (where the taxes are low).
To prevent this, tax authorities require companies to set their transfer prices according to the arm’s length principle.
This means that the price should be the same as it would be if the transaction were between unrelated companies, ensuring that each country gets its fair share of tax revenue.
Transfer pricing is a critical aspect of international tax law because it helps prevent companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries.
By ensuring that transactions between related companies are priced fairly, transfer pricing rules help create a more level playing field for businesses and ensure that governments can collect the taxes they are owed.
If you have any queries about this article, or international tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.
Kenya has taken a significant step toward adopting the OECD’s global tax standards by introducing a Minimum Top-Up Tax.
This new measure ensures that multinational companies operating in Kenya will pay a minimum tax of 15% on their profits, aligning Kenya with the OECD’s Pillar Two framework.
The OECD’s Pillar Two framework was designed to prevent large corporations from avoiding taxes by shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions.
Under this framework, countries are encouraged to introduce a global minimum tax rate of 15%.
Kenya’s new Minimum Top-Up Tax will apply to multinational corporations operating in the country, ensuring that these companies are taxed at an effective rate of at least 15%.
If a company’s profits are taxed at a lower rate, the Kenyan government will impose a top-up to bring the effective rate to 15%.
The introduction of this tax is part of a broader global effort to ensure tax fairness and prevent profit shifting.
By ensuring that companies pay at least 15% in taxes, Kenya is joining other countries in trying to curb tax avoidance strategies that see profits moved to low-tax jurisdictions.
For Kenya, this is a significant move, as many multinational companies, particularly in the tech and financial sectors, operate within the country.
Large corporations operating in Kenya will need to carefully examine their tax structures to ensure compliance with the new rules.
Companies that have relied on tax incentives or reduced tax rates will now be subject to the Minimum Top-Up Tax, potentially increasing their overall tax liabilities.
More information about Kenya’s implementation of the Minimum Top-Up Tax can be found through the Kenya Revenue Authority here.
Kenya’s decision to adopt the Minimum Top-Up Tax aligns the country with global tax standards and demonstrates its commitment to tax fairness.
This move is expected to generate additional revenue for the country while reducing the risk of tax avoidance by multinational corporations.
If you have any queries about this article on the Kenya Minimum Top-Up Tax, or tax matters in Kenya, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Kenya and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
Pillar Two is the second part of the OECD’s global tax reform, and its main goal is to introduce a global minimum tax rate for large multinational companies.
This helps prevent companies from shifting their profits to low-tax jurisdictions, commonly known as tax havens, to avoid paying taxes.
Pillar Two introduces a global minimum tax rate of 15%.
This means that even if a company is based in a country with a tax rate lower than 15%, other countries where the company operates can “top up” the tax to ensure that the company pays at least 15% on its profits.
The global minimum tax is designed to stop companies from using tax havens to avoid paying taxes.
By ensuring that all large companies pay a minimum level of tax, the OECD hopes to create a fairer global tax system.
Under Pillar Two, countries can introduce a Top-Up Tax, which ensures that companies with subsidiaries in low-tax countries pay additional taxes to bring their total tax rate up to 15%.
The Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) allows parent companies to pay extra tax on the income of their foreign subsidiaries if those subsidiaries are taxed below the global minimum rate.
Pillar Two is a major development in the fight against tax avoidance.
By introducing a global minimum tax rate, it ensures that companies can’t take advantage of tax havens to avoid paying taxes.
This creates a more level playing field for countries and helps them collect the tax revenues they need to fund public services.
If you have any queries about this article – What is the OECD’s Pillar Two – then please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
On 1 September 2024, the Kingdom of Bahrain made a significant move by publishing Decree-Law No. (11) of 2024, which introduces the Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (DMTT) for large multinational enterprises (MNEs).
This new law applies to multinationals with a global annual revenue exceeding €750 million and marks a major shift in Bahrain’s tax landscape, particularly as the country has not previously imposed a corporate income tax on businesses.
The DMTT will come into effect on 1 January 2025, and companies affected by this law must register with the National Bureau for Revenue of Bahrain.
While the specific regulations and procedures are still pending publication, it’s clear that non-compliance will have serious consequences.
The introduction of the DMTT aligns with Bahrain’s commitment to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and its global two-pillar tax reform initiative (Pillar 2).
This initiative has been endorsed by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and over 140 countries worldwide.
Pillar 2 of the OECD’s reform is designed to ensure that large multinational companies pay a minimum level of tax on the profits they earn across the globe, regardless of the jurisdiction in which they operate.
This initiative is part of a broader effort to combat base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), where companies shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions to avoid paying taxes.
The penalties for failing to comply with the DMTT are severe. According to Article 35 of Decree-Law No. (11) of 2024, any failure to register for tax purposes will be classified as tax evasion, which is a criminal offence in Bahrain.
The punishments include:
Companies must take this seriously to avoid these harsh penalties. The law’s strict penalties are intended to ensure that multinationals comply fully with the new tax rules.
What makes this move particularly interesting is that Bahrain has not yet introduced a corporate tax on the profits of companies based in the country.
This makes Bahrain the only GCC state without a regular corporate income tax.
However, by introducing the DMTT, Bahrain becomes the first GCC country to implement a tax regime in line with Pillar 2 of the OECD’s global tax framework.
This sets Bahrain apart from its neighbours and could be a signal that change is coming for other countries in the region.
For now, it appears that companies that fall below the €750 million revenue threshold will continue to benefit from Bahrain’s zero-corporate-tax policy.
However, it remains to be seen how long this situation will continue, especially given the global push towards greater tax fairness and transparency.
The introduction of the Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax is a landmark shift for Bahrain and a clear indication that the country is committed to playing its part in the global tax reform movement.
While Bahrain has traditionally been a tax haven for multinational companies, this new law shows that it is adapting to the changing global tax environment.
Large multinational enterprises should prepare to comply with the new rules and ensure that they register with the National Bureau for Revenue to avoid hefty penalties.
As Bahrain takes this step, it will be interesting to watch how the country’s tax policies evolve in the future and whether other GCC countries follow suit.
If you have any queries on this article about Bahrain Introduces Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax, or other tax matters in the GCC, then please get in touch.
The United Nations (UN) is stepping up its role in international tax policy, aiming to create a new framework for global tax cooperation.
Historically, organisations like the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have led the way in setting international tax standards.
However, the UN’s involvement signals a shift towards giving developing countries a stronger voice in shaping tax rules, particularly as digitalisation and globalisation have created new challenges for traditional tax systems.
The UN’s new framework is expected to focus on improving tax cooperation between countries, addressing issues like tax evasion, and ensuring fair taxation of multinational corporations.
The global tax system is under increasing strain. Large multinational companies, especially in the tech sector, often pay very little tax in the countries where they generate profits.
This is largely due to tax avoidance strategies that involve shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions.
While developed countries have been trying to address this issue through initiatives like the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, developing countries argue that they have been left out of the conversation.
The UN believes that a new framework could help level the playing field for developing nations, allowing them to claim their fair share of tax revenues.
This is particularly important as many developing countries rely on corporate tax revenues to fund public services.
The UN’s proposed global tax framework is expected to focus on several key areas:
While the UN’s push for a new global tax framework is ambitious, it faces several challenges.
For one, many developed countries, particularly those in the OECD, are already working on their own tax reforms, including the global minimum tax under Pillar Two.
Some may be reluctant to give the UN a bigger role in tax matters, fearing that it could complicate or slow down existing efforts.
Moreover, multinational companies may push back against any rules that significantly increase their tax burden.
Countries with low tax rates, like Ireland or certain Caribbean nations, may also resist changes that could hurt their status as attractive locations for businesses.
The UN’s involvement in creating a new global tax framework is a sign that the world is recognising the need for more inclusive tax policies.
As the global economy becomes increasingly digital and interconnected, it’s important that all countries—especially developing ones—have a say in how taxes are collected.
If successful, the UN’s efforts could lead to a fairer and more transparent international tax system, where corporations contribute their fair share and countries can cooperate more effectively to combat tax evasion.
If you have any queries about this article on the United Nations New Global Tax Framework, or other international tax matters, then please get in touch.
Corporate tax is the tax paid by businesses on their profits. Some countries, like Gibraltar, have relatively low corporate tax rates to attract companies to set up operations there.
However, due to international tax changes, Gibraltar is considering increasing its corporate tax rate to remain compliant with global standards.
Gibraltar’s current corporate tax rate is 12.5%, one of the lowest in the world. Many businesses choose Gibraltar because of this attractive tax environment.
However, the introduction of the OECD’s Pillar 2 global minimum tax—set at 15%—means Gibraltar might have to raise its tax rate to align with this international rule.
The global minimum tax is designed to prevent companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries to avoid paying taxes.
Countries with tax rates lower than 15% may have to increase them, or other countries where companies operate can “top up” the tax to meet the 15% threshold.
If Gibraltar increases its tax rate, it could still remain competitive compared to other countries, but businesses might have to adjust their tax planning strategies.
Some companies that rely on Gibraltar’s low tax rate might look for other tax-friendly jurisdictions.
On the other hand, by complying with the global minimum tax, Gibraltar will improve its reputation as a transparent and cooperative tax jurisdiction, which could attract more responsible businesses.
Companies currently benefiting from Gibraltar’s low corporate tax rate will need to evaluate how the increase will affect their profits.
They may have to pay higher taxes if the rate rises to 15%.
However, many businesses may find that Gibraltar remains an attractive place to operate, especially because of its other benefits, like a favourable regulatory environment and access to European markets.
Gibraltar’s potential corporate tax rate increase is part of a global shift towards greater tax transparency and cooperation.
While businesses may need to adjust to the new rate, Gibraltar’s continued compliance with international standards will likely strengthen its position in the global economy.
If you have any queries about this article on Gibraltar Considers Corporate Tax Rate Increase, or tax matters in Gibraltar more generally, then please get in touch.
Firstly, what is the Global Minimum Tax?
A global minimum tax is a tax rule that tries to stop big companies from paying very little tax by moving their profits to countries with super low taxes (called “tax havens”).
The idea is that every big company should pay at least a certain percentage of tax, no matter where they are based.
Japan is one of the countries working to put this rule into action. But it’s not easy, and Japan still has a long way to go before it can fully introduce the global minimum tax.
In 2021, Japan agreed with other countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to introduce a global minimum tax of 15%.
This means that even if a company is based in a low-tax country, Japan can still charge it extra tax to make sure it’s paying at least 15%.
But agreeing to the tax is just the first step. Japan still needs to pass laws and create systems that can track companies and make sure they are following the rules. This is where things get tricky.
One of the big challenges Japan is facing is making sure it has all the right tools to check how much profit companies are making and where they are making it.
This requires a lot of coordination with other countries, especially because big companies can have hundreds of subsidiaries in different parts of the world.
Another challenge is making sure that Japan’s laws match up with the global rules set by the OECD.
If Japan’s rules are different from those in other countries, it could cause confusion and make it harder to enforce the tax.
Japan is working hard to put all the pieces together, but it will take some time. Experts say that Japan’s full global minimum tax system might not be ready for another few years.
The global minimum tax is a big deal because it helps ensure that big companies pay their fair share of taxes.
For Japan, making sure this tax works is important for protecting its economy and making sure that tax revenue is being used to improve services for everyone.
If you have any queries about this article on Global Minimum Tax in Japan, or any other Japanese tax matters, then please get in touch.
A participation exemption is a key tax mechanism designed to avoid double taxation on income earned from foreign subsidiaries.
It allows companies to receive dividends from their foreign investments without being taxed again in the home country.
This exemption is an attractive feature for businesses with a multinational presence, as it encourages cross-border investments while eliminating the risk of double taxation.
Ireland, already known for its business-friendly tax environment, is introducing a new participation exemption as part of its tax reforms.
This is expected to enhance its appeal to multinational companies and investors looking for efficient tax structures within the EU.
Ireland’s low corporate tax rate of 12.5% has long made it a popular choice for multinationals.
Now, with the introduction of a participation exemption, Ireland is aligning itself with other European countries that already offer similar incentives.
The exemption allows Irish-based companies to receive dividends and capital gains from foreign subsidiaries without paying additional tax in Ireland, provided the subsidiary meets certain conditions.
These conditions generally require the subsidiary to be based in a country with which Ireland has a tax treaty and for the Irish company to hold at least a 5% ownership stake in the subsidiary.
This is particularly advantageous for companies looking to repatriate profits from their overseas operations, as they can now do so without incurring a tax burden in Ireland.
The new participation exemption applies under specific conditions, as follows:
This new rule makes Ireland a more attractive location for holding companies that manage international subsidiaries, further boosting its competitiveness in the global tax landscape.
Ireland’s participation exemption is expected to attract even more foreign direct investment, particularly from multinationals looking for an efficient tax regime within the EU.
By eliminating the risk of double taxation on foreign earnings, Ireland offers a compelling proposition for companies with global operations.
Furthermore, this new tax policy could encourage companies to restructure their international holdings to take advantage of Ireland’s favourable tax regime.
As many businesses seek alternatives to the UK post-Brexit, Ireland’s new participation exemption strengthens its position as a key financial hub within the EU.
While the participation exemption is a welcome addition to Ireland’s tax policies, it will need to be balanced with the global trend towards higher corporate tax transparency and compliance.
For instance, the OECD’s Pillar 2 of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative introduces a global minimum tax of 15%, which could limit the effectiveness of Ireland’s low-tax regime.
Moreover, Ireland’s tax policies have been scrutinised by the European Union in the past, especially regarding state aid and preferential treatment of multinationals.
The participation exemption, while beneficial, will need to comply with these international regulations.
Ireland’s introduction of a participation exemption is a strategic move that will likely increase its appeal as a destination for multinational companies.
By offering a tax-efficient way to manage foreign earnings, Ireland positions itself as a leading hub for international investments.
However, companies will need to ensure that they remain compliant with evolving global tax standards while taking advantage of this new opportunity.
For more information about Ireland Progresses New Participation Exemption, or Irish tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.
The global minimum tax is a concept designed to ensure that multinational companies pay a minimum level of tax regardless of where they are headquartered or where their profits are generated.
It is part of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, specifically within Pillar 2 of the reforms.
The idea is to prevent companies from shifting their profits to low-tax jurisdictions, also known as tax havens, to minimise their tax liabilities.
In 2024, the global minimum tax rate of 15% will take effect, marking a significant milestone in global tax reform.
This change will affect multinational companies operating across multiple jurisdictions and require new strategies to ensure compliance.
Pillar 2 is one of two pillars in the OECD’s tax reform strategy.
While Pillar 1 focuses on reallocating taxing rights, Pillar 2 introduces a global minimum tax rate to ensure that multinational companies pay at least 15% tax on their profits, regardless of where they are based.
This means that if a company operates in a country with a corporate tax rate below 15%, other countries can “top up” the tax to meet the minimum rate.
For example, if a company is headquartered in a country with a 10% corporate tax rate, another country where the company operates can impose an additional 5% tax to meet the 15% global minimum rate.
The introduction of the global minimum tax aims to tackle base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), where companies move profits to low-tax jurisdictions to avoid paying higher taxes in the countries where they generate income.
This practice has resulted in significant tax revenue losses for many countries, particularly those in the developing world.
The OECD estimates that Pillar 2 will generate an additional $150 billion in global tax revenue each year.
This is expected to reduce the incentive for companies to engage in aggressive tax planning strategies and create a fairer tax system worldwide.
To implement Pillar 2, countries will need to adopt new laws and regulations.
These laws will allow tax authorities to assess whether multinational companies are paying the minimum tax rate.
If a company’s effective tax rate falls below 15%, the country can apply a top-up tax to ensure compliance.
One of the key features of Pillar 2 is the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), which allows countries to tax the foreign income of a multinational if the foreign jurisdiction’s tax rate is below the global minimum.
Additionally, the Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR) ensures that deductions for certain payments are denied if they are made to low-tax jurisdictions.
Multinational companies will need to adapt their tax strategies to comply with the new global minimum tax rules.
This may involve restructuring operations, reviewing transfer pricing arrangements, and ensuring that they have systems in place to accurately calculate their effective tax rate in each jurisdiction.
For companies that have previously benefited from tax havens or low-tax jurisdictions, Pillar 2 could result in higher tax liabilities.
However, the global minimum tax will create a more level playing field, as companies will be less able to shift profits to low-tax countries to avoid paying higher taxes.
The introduction of the global minimum tax under Pillar 2 marks a significant shift in international tax policy.
By ensuring that companies pay at least 15% tax on their profits, regardless of where they operate, the OECD aims to reduce tax avoidance and create a fairer global tax system.
While this change will require companies to adapt, it represents a major step towards addressing the challenges of base erosion and profit shifting.
If you have any queries about this article on OECD Pillar 2, or any international tax matters, then please get in touch.