Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
Lakshmi Mittal, one of the world’s most prominent industrialists and among the wealthiest residents of the UK, is reportedly considering leaving the country.
The reason?
Changes to the UK’s non-domicile (non-dom) tax rules.
This news has stirred debate about whether tax policy should prioritise fairness or global competitiveness — and whether the UK is risking an exodus of its wealthiest residents.
Mittal is the executive chairman of ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest steel company.
He has lived in the UK for many years and is famously known for purchasing the lavish Kensington Palace Gardens residence, dubbed the “Taj Mittal.”
His presence in the UK has often been seen as a symbol of London’s status as a hub for international high-net-worth individuals.
The UK has long offered favourable tax treatment to individuals who are resident but not domiciled in the UK.
Under this regime, many such individuals can elect to be taxed on the “remittance basis,” meaning foreign income and gains are only taxed if brought into the UK.
However, recent government reforms aim to abolish the remittance basis of tax system.
From 2025, long-term residents will face tighter rules, with the remittance basis being removed as a means of taxation.
The remittance basis will be replaced by a foreign income and gains exemption (“FIG”) that provides an exemption to certain people arriving in the UK for a maximum of 4 years.
Mittal, like many non-doms, has complex international affairs and substantial income from assets held outside the UK.
If his tax burden increases significantly, relocating to a more favourable jurisdiction becomes a viable option.
Dubai, Monaco, and Switzerland are often cited as alternative homes for mobile billionaires.
His departure would be both financially and symbolically significant.
It raises the question of how many other wealthy residents might follow.
Proponents of reform argue that all UK residents should contribute fairly to public finances, especially during a cost-of-living crisis.
Critics warn that targeting non-doms could reduce inward investment and encourage capital flight.
The UK’s challenge is to balance modernising its tax rules… without undermining its attractiveness to global wealth.
This balancing act is not unique to Britain, but it’s one that may shape its economic future.
Mittal’s possible exit underscores the sensitive balance between tax fairness and international competitiveness.
Whether this is the beginning of a broader trend or a high-profile exception remains to be seen — but policymakers and advisers will be watching closely.
If you have any queries about this article on non-dom tax status, or tax matters in the United Kingdom then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United Kingdom and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Imagine being owed hundreds, or even thousands, of dollars – and not knowing it.
That’s the situation for nearly a million people in the United States, according to a recent warning from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
The IRS says there’s over $1 billion in unclaimed tax refunds from previous years just sitting there, waiting for people to come and get it.
This isn’t a scam. It’s real money. And if people don’t act soon, they might lose it forever.
Each year, millions of Americans are owed refunds after filing their tax returns.
Sometimes, though, people don’t file a return – maybe because they didn’t earn much, didn’t realise they could get money back, or simply forgot.
The IRS gives people three years to claim a refund, but after that, it’s too late.
Right now, the clock is ticking for tax year 2020. That’s the year when the pandemic disrupted work, routines, and finances for so many.
But it also means many people may have missed out on refunds because they didn’t file.
The IRS estimates that nearly 940,000 taxpayers are due a refund, with the median amount around $932.
That means half of the unclaimed refunds are larger than $932, and half are smaller. That’s not small change – especially at a time when people are feeling the pinch of inflation.
Many of the unclaimed refunds are from low-income workers or students who didn’t realise they were eligible.
Some may not have filed because their income was below the threshold where filing is legally required.
But even if you’re not required to file, you can still get a refund if tax was withheld from your pay cheque or you’re entitled to certain credits.
For 2020, this includes the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) – which can be worth over $6,000 depending on your circumstances.
It also includes pandemic-related stimulus payments that some people may not have received.
The IRS has made it clear: if you don’t file your 2020 tax return by 15 May 2024, you’ll lose your right to the refund.
After that date, the money goes into the U.S. Treasury and you can’t claim it anymore.
To help people, the IRS has reopened online tools to request wage and income transcripts, and they’re encouraging those who may have missed out to speak to a tax professional, even if they think they’re not owed anything.
If you didn’t file a tax return for 2020, it’s worth checking whether you should have. Especially if you had a job, even part-time, and had tax taken out.
You can still file a return for free using IRS Free File tools if your income is below a certain level.
You’ll need:
Your 2020 income details (like W-2s or 1099s)
Social Security numbers for yourself and your dependants
Bank account info to receive your refund directly
If you’re missing old paperwork, the IRS can help retrieve your income records. But time is short.
This isn’t about loopholes or fancy tax planning. It’s simply about people being owed money and not claiming it.
If you or someone you know didn’t file a tax return in 2020, now’s the time to act.
After May, the money disappears – and there’s no going back.
If you have any queries about this article on unclaimed tax refunds, or tax matters in the United States then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Inheritance tax is often called Britain’s most controversial levy, and for good reason.
Over the years, pensions have been considered one of the more tax-efficient ways to pass on wealth, often avoiding inheritance tax entirely.
But from 2027, significant changes are on the horizon that will make pensions subject to inheritance tax in certain cases.
Let’s explore the details of this upcoming rule change and its implications.
At present, pensions sit outside of your estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes.
This has made them an attractive tool for passing wealth between generations.
If you die before the age of 75, the funds in your pension can be passed on tax-free to your beneficiaries.
Even if you die after 75, they’ll only pay income tax on withdrawals at their marginal rate, rather than the 40% IHT charge.
This favourable treatment has often been used by savvy individuals to manage their wealth, leaving pensions untouched and living off other income sources to maximize the tax efficiency of their estate.
From April 2027, pensions will no longer automatically sit outside the inheritance tax net.
Instead, they will form part of the deceased’s estate and could attract the standard IHT rate of 40% if the estate value exceeds the nil-rate band (£325,000 as of 2024).
The government has announced consultations on how these changes will be implemented. Key points under discussion include:
For many families, these changes could significantly reduce the value of inherited wealth. Consider a pension worth £500,000:
Planning ahead will be crucial to minimizing the impact of these changes. Potential strategies include:
The inclusion of pensions in inheritance tax planning from 2027 marks a significant shift in how families manage and transfer wealth.
While the exact details are still under consultation, the potential impact is clear: less wealth passed to loved ones and more tax revenue for the Treasury.
Families and advisers alike should start reviewing estate plans now to stay ahead of the changes.
If you have any queries about this article on inheritance tax and pensions, or tax matters in the UK, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UK and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
India’s tax system is undergoing significant evolution, with recent trends shedding light on the changing dynamics of personal income taxation.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has released detailed time series data covering taxpayers, taxes collected, and income tax return patterns.
These statistics provide valuable insights into how India’s tax landscape is adapting to economic growth, compliance initiatives, and digital advancements.
This article explores the trends shaping personal income tax in India, highlighting their implications for taxpayers and policymakers alike.
One of the most notable trends is the steady increase in the number of taxpayers.
Over the past decade, the government’s efforts to expand the tax net through initiatives such as demonetization, Goods and Services Tax (GST) integration, and improved digital reporting have yielded results.
The data reveals a marked rise in income tax return filings, reflecting both enhanced compliance and a growing middle class.
With more individuals entering formal employment and accessing higher wages, the taxpayer base is expected to continue its upward trajectory.
India’s personal income tax revenue has seen a robust increase in recent years, driven by higher tax collections from the upper-middle and high-income segments.
This shift underscores the growing contribution of wealthier individuals to the country’s revenue base.
However, the government has also introduced measures to ease the burden on lower-income earners, such as:
These measures aim to strike a balance between revenue generation and ensuring fairness for those at the lower end of the income spectrum.
Digital transformation has been a cornerstone of India’s tax reforms.
Initiatives like the Annual Information Statement (AIS) and Form 26AS provide taxpayers with a comprehensive view of their financial transactions, promoting transparency and reducing errors in filings.
The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning by tax authorities has further enhanced scrutiny and compliance.
For instance, data analytics tools are now employed to detect discrepancies in reported incomes, discouraging evasion.
While the trends are encouraging, challenges persist.
Expanding the tax base remains a priority, particularly in capturing incomes from informal sectors and self-employment.
Additionally, the complexity of India’s dual tax regime—offering old and new systems—has left some taxpayers confused about which structure benefits them most.
India’s personal income tax landscape reflects a country in transition, leveraging technology and policy reforms to improve compliance and equity.
As the system evolves, taxpayers must remain proactive in understanding their obligations and benefits to navigate these changes effectively.
If you have any queries about this article on India’s personal income tax trends, or tax matters in India, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in India and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Estate planning is often viewed as a straightforward process: draft a will, set up a trust, and ensure your wishes are documented.
However, beneath the surface lie hidden pitfalls that can derail even the most carefully crafted plans.
From outdated documents to unforeseen tax implications, these issues can result in disputes, unnecessary tax burdens, or unintended distributions.
Understanding these common flaws is essential to ensure your estate plan achieves its intended goals.
One of the most frequent issues with estate plans is outdated documents.
Life events such as marriages, divorces, births, or deaths can drastically alter family dynamics and financial priorities.
A will or trust created decades ago may no longer reflect current circumstances, leading to unintended consequences.
For instance, failing to update a will after a divorce could result in an ex-spouse inheriting assets.
Similarly, neglecting to include provisions for newly born grandchildren might exclude them from your estate altogether.
Tax laws are constantly evolving, and estate plans must adapt to these changes.
In the UK, for example, inheritance tax thresholds and exemptions can significantly impact the distribution of assets.
Without careful planning, families may face unexpected tax bills that reduce the value of their inheritance.
Trusts, while valuable tools for asset protection, can also create tax liabilities if not structured correctly.
Misunderstanding the tax treatment of certain assets, such as overseas properties or business interests, can further complicate matters.
Vague or ambiguous language in estate planning documents can lead to disputes among beneficiaries.
For example, phrases like “equal distribution” may seem clear but can create confusion if the assets in question include a mix of liquid funds and illiquid properties.
Disagreements over interpretations can escalate into costly legal battles, ultimately undermining the intentions of the plan.
In the digital age, personal and financial information often resides online.
Yet, many estate plans overlook how to manage or transfer digital assets such as cryptocurrency, online accounts, or intellectual property.
Failing to address these assets can leave them inaccessible to heirs, creating unnecessary complications for the estate’s administration.
Hidden flaws in estate plans can lead to outcomes far removed from the planner’s intentions.
Regularly reviewing and updating estate documents, understanding the tax implications of your assets, and ensuring clear language can mitigate these risks.
As the world evolves, estate planning must keep pace to reflect new realities and technologies.
If you have any queries about this article on estate planning pitfalls or tax matters in your jurisdiction, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Germany has unveiled proposed changes to its inheritance tax laws, sparking widespread concern among families, property owners, and financial advisers.
The revisions, aimed at increasing revenue and addressing perceived inequalities in the system, could significantly impact how wealth is passed down through generations.
This article delves into the key aspects of these changes, the public reaction, and what taxpayers need to know.
The German government has outlined adjustments to the valuation rules for inherited assets, particularly real estate. The primary changes include:
Real estate will now be valued closer to its market value rather than using the previously favorable valuation formulas.
This could lead to significant increases in taxable value, especially in urban areas where property prices have surged.
The thresholds for tax exemptions remain unchanged, but with higher valuations, more estates will now fall within the taxable bracket.
Family homes that were often passed tax-free under specific conditions may now face increased scrutiny.
For estates exceeding €6 million, tax rates could rise from the current maximum of 30% to as much as 35%.
The government argues that the existing system disproportionately benefits wealthy families and is out of step with Germany’s broader goals of tax fairness and equity.
By aligning property valuations with market rates, they aim to close loopholes that have historically allowed significant wealth transfers with minimal tax liabilities.
Families owning property in high-demand areas, such as Berlin or Munich, will feel the brunt of these changes.
Wealth advisers are already reporting a surge in inquiries from clients concerned about these implications.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the proposals have been met with a mixed response:
The real estate and legal sectors have also voiced concerns, calling for transitional measures and exemptions to soften the blow.
Tax advisers recommend that families take proactive steps to mitigate the impact:
Germany’s proposed inheritance tax reforms mark a significant shift in the taxation landscape, with substantial implications for property owners and families.
The next few months will reveal whether these changes are enacted as proposed or modified following public feedback.
If you have any queries about this article on Germany’s inheritance tax rules, or tax matters in Germany, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Germany and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Brazil is taking significant steps to reform its tax system, aiming to alleviate the financial burden on low-income earners.
The government plans to exempt individuals earning up to 5,000 reais (approximately $850) per month from income tax.
This move aligns with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva‘s campaign promises and seeks to promote economic equity.
The current income tax exemption threshold in Brazil is 2,824 reais per month.
The proposed reform would nearly double this threshold, allowing more workers to retain a larger portion of their earnings.
Finance Minister Fernando Haddad has indicated that this change is part of a broader tax reform strategy, which may include taxing higher-income individuals to offset revenue losses.
Following the announcement, Brazilian markets experienced volatility.
The real depreciated over 1% against the U.S. dollar, and the Bovespa index fell by 1.4%.
Investors expressed concerns about potential reductions in government revenue and the impact on fiscal reforms.
The government aims to balance these concerns by implementing measures to tax the super-rich and high salaries.
For low-income workers, this tax exemption represents a significant financial relief.
By increasing the tax-free income threshold, the government intends to enhance disposable income for millions, potentially stimulating consumer spending and economic growth.
Brazil’s initiative to raise the income tax exemption threshold reflects a commitment to social equity and economic stimulation.
While market reactions indicate some investor apprehension, the government’s comprehensive approach aims to balance fiscal responsibility with support for low-income earners.
If you have any queries about this article on income tax exemptions, or tax matters in Brazil, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Brazil and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
The Beckham Law, officially known as Spain’s “Special Regime for Posted Workers,” has been gaining attention for its significant tax benefits to expatriates moving to Spain for work.
Designed to attract high-skilled professionals, remote workers, and investors, this regime offers eligible individuals the opportunity to pay a flat income tax rate of 24% instead of the progressive rates of up to 47% typically applied in Spain.
With recent updates introduced by the Spanish government, the Beckham Law has become even more accessible, making Spain an attractive destination for global talent.
Originally introduced to encourage foreign footballers to play in Spain (hence the nickname), the Beckham Law allows expatriates to maintain non-resident tax status for six years while residing in Spain. This means:
In 2024, the Spanish government implemented several changes to broaden the scope of the regime:
Previously, applicants had to prove they hadn’t been a tax resident in Spain for 10 years. This has now been reduced to 5 years, making it easier for professionals to qualify
The Beckham Law now covers:
Spouses and dependent children under 25 (or disabled family members) can benefit from the regime, provided they relocate during the taxpayer’s first year in Spain. However, this extension is limited if the family’s total savings income exceeds the taxpayer’s taxable base.
Employment income received in kind (e.g., housing or other non-cash benefits) is now tax-exempt under the regime, aligning with the treatment of Spanish residents.
To qualify for the Beckham Law, applicants must meet the following conditions:
Excluded groups include freelancers without special visas, athletes, and directors of passive holding companies.
Applying for the Beckham Law involves submitting documentation to Spain’s Tax Agency within six months of registering with Spanish Social Security. Required documents include:
While the Beckham Law offers substantial tax advantages, it comes with certain limitations. For example:
The Beckham Law remains a cornerstone of Spain’s efforts to attract international talent, particularly in the post-pandemic era, where remote work and global mobility have become more common.
Recent updates make it easier for expatriates, digital nomads, and entrepreneurs to benefit from Spain’s vibrant culture, high quality of life, and favorable tax regime.
However, potential applicants should carefully assess the implications of Spain’s Solidarity Tax and consult professionals to ensure full compliance and maximum benefit.
If you have any queries about this article on the Beckham Law or tax matters in Spain, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Spain and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) has issued Ministerial Decision No. 261 of 2024 (MD261) concerning Unincorporated Partnerships, Foreign Partnerships, and Family Foundations.
MD261 repeals the earlier Ministerial Decision No. 127 of 2023 and applies retrospectively from 1 June 2023.
This article highlights the key amendments introduced by MD261 and their implications.
Under Article 5(2) of MD261, juridical persons wholly owned and controlled by Family Foundations treated as Unincorporated Partnerships may now apply to the Federal Tax Authority (FTA) for the same tax-transparent status, provided the following conditions are met:
This amendment provides greater flexibility for Family Foundations in structuring their ownership and tax arrangements.
Article 3 of MD261 revises the notification requirements for Unincorporated Partnerships treated as Taxable Persons under the CT Law:
This amendment simplifies compliance for Unincorporated Partnerships, reducing the administrative burden of immediate notifications.
MD261 also introduces changes regarding the classification of foreign partnerships as Unincorporated Partnerships under the CT Law.
These amendments refine the conditions under which foreign partnerships may elect for tax transparency, ensuring consistency with the updated provisions.
Ministerial Decision No. 261 of 2024 introduces meaningful changes for Family Foundations, Unincorporated Partnerships, and Foreign Partnerships, providing greater clarity and flexibility under the UAE’s corporate tax framework.
These amendments reduce compliance burdens and enhance tax structuring options for eligible entities.
If you have any queries about this article on Unincorporated (and foreign) Partnerships & Family Foundations or tax matters in the UAE more generally, please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UAE and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) is a special tax system designed to ensure that high-income earners pay at least a minimum amount of tax, even if they qualify for a lot of tax breaks under the regular tax system.
The AMT was created to prevent people with very high incomes from using deductions and loopholes to avoid paying taxes altogether.
For 2024, the IRS has raised the AMT exemption, which is the amount of income that’s not subject to the AMT.
For 2024, the AMT exemption has been raised to £85,700 for single filers and £119,300 for married couples filing jointly.
This means that if your income is below these amounts, you won’t have to worry about paying the AMT.
The AMT exemption phases out for higher earners, starting at £578,150 for single filers and £1,156,300 for married couples.
If your income exceeds these thresholds, you may still have to pay the AMT.
The AMT typically affects high-income earners who claim a lot of deductions or have complex tax situations.
For example, if you claim a large number of deductions for state and local taxes, home mortgage interest, or investment losses, you might be subject to the AMT.
The AMT ensures that everyone pays at least a minimum level of tax, even if they qualify for a lot of deductions under the regular tax system.
The IRS adjusts the AMT exemption every year to account for inflation.
Without these adjustments, more and more people would be subject to the AMT over time, even if their real incomes haven’t increased.
By raising the exemption, the IRS ensures that the AMT continues to target only the highest-income taxpayers.
The increase in the AMT exemption for 2024 is good news for high-income taxpayers who might otherwise be subject to the AMT.
By raising the exemption, the IRS is helping to ensure that only those with very high incomes and large deductions will have to pay the AMT, while still ensuring that everyone pays their fair share of taxes.
If you have any queries about the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) 2024, or any other US tax matters, then please get in touch.