Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
HMRC’s latest figures show an 11% increase in the collection of tax debts from UK taxpayers living overseas.
This rise highlights the UK’s enhanced efforts to track and recover unpaid taxes from expatriates, though concerns remain about the accuracy of data used in such initiatives.
With an increasingly global workforce, tracking tax liabilities across borders has become a pressing issue for tax authorities.
For HMRC, the challenge lies in identifying and pursuing debts from taxpayers who have left the UK, often with limited contact information.
HMRC employs a combination of international agreements, including tax treaties and information exchange frameworks, to locate and recover tax debts from overseas residents.
Recent advancements in digital tools have also enhanced HMRC’s ability to cross-reference data and pursue outstanding liabilities.
While the 11% increase in recovered debts is noteworthy, questions remain about the reliability of HMRC’s data.
Incorrect or outdated information can lead to taxpayers being wrongly pursued, undermining trust in the system.
Experts have called for greater transparency and accuracy in HMRC’s processes.
HMRC’s efforts to recover overseas tax debts reflect its commitment to ensuring tax compliance.
However, the approach must be balanced with safeguards to prevent errors and maintain public confidence in the tax system.
If you have any queries about this article on HMRC’s overseas debt collection, or tax matters in the UK, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UK and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Rupert Grint, famously known as Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter franchise, has found himself at the centre of a significant tax dispute.
A UK tribunal recently ruled that Grint owes £1.8 million in taxes after he incorrectly classified his earnings for tax purposes.
This case sheds light on the complexities of tax compliance for high-net-worth individuals, particularly those in the entertainment industry.
The dispute arose over how Grint managed his finances between 2009 and 2010.
During this period, he attempted to shift £4.5 million of his income from acting into capital accounts.
The move was aimed at securing a lower tax rate, as capital gains are often taxed at lower rates compared to income tax.
However, the tribunal agreed with HMRC that the transactions, as they were mainly motivated by the obtaining of a tax advantage, they fell foul of specific anti-avoidance provisions.
This case serves as a cautionary tale for individuals managing large sums of money, particularly those with income from diverse sources.
Tax laws can be complex, and seemingly straightforward financial decisions can have substantial tax implications.
For actors and entertainers, income streams often include not only salaries but also royalties, endorsements, and residual payments.
There are several takeaways from Grint’s experience:
Rupert Grint’s tax troubles underline the complexities of tax compliance for entertainers and other high-net-worth individuals.
While the allure of tax savings is understandable, it’s crucial to navigate the rules carefully to avoid running afoul of the law.
If you have any queries about this article on the Rupert Grint tax case, tax disputes for entertainers or tax matters in the UK more generally, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UK and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Roger Ver, famously known as “Bitcoin Jesus” for his early and passionate advocacy of cryptocurrency, finds himself at the centre of a legal battle with the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The dispute revolves around an eye-watering $48 million tax bill, allegedly tied to Ver’s renunciation of U.S. citizenship in 2014.
At the heart of the case lies the expatriation tax, a measure designed to ensure individuals departing the U.S. tax system settle their dues before cutting ties.
For Ver, who reportedly misrepresented his Bitcoin holdings, this law has led to allegations of tax evasion, filing false returns, and even mail fraud.
The expatriation tax—officially the Expatriation Tax under the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax (HEART) Act of 2008—is a mechanism to prevent high-net-worth individuals from sidestepping U.S. taxes by renouncing their citizenship.
The law applies to:
Under this rule, certain assets are treated as if sold (a “deemed sale”) the day before expatriation, and any unrealized gains are taxed.
For instance, if you hold stock with a cost basis of $500,000 that is now worth $1 million, the $500,000 gain is taxed—even if you haven’t sold the stock.
In Ver’s case, his Bitcoin holdings and associated business assets are central to the IRS’s allegations.
Back in 2014, Bitcoin was in its nascent stages, and Ver was among its most vocal proponents.
However, the IRS claims that Ver significantly understated the value of his crypto assets, including those held by his companies MemoryDealers and Agilestar.
By 2017, Bitcoin’s meteoric rise in value amplified these alleged understatements.
According to prosecutors, Ver sold tens of thousands of Bitcoin through his businesses, earning approximately $240 million—tax-free.
Additionally, Ver is accused of:
Ver’s legal team has pushed back hard against the allegations, framing the expatriation tax as:
Moreover, Ver’s lawyers have accused the IRS of ignoring documentation that purportedly demonstrates his lack of intent to evade taxes.
Conversely, the IRS insists that Ver knowingly underreported his assets and acted in bad faith to reduce his tax liability.
The Ver case underscores broader challenges in taxing cryptocurrencies:
The IRS’s aggressive stance suggests a growing resolve to close loopholes and enforce compliance in this fast-evolving sector.
The stakes couldn’t be higher:
For Ver, a man who once epitomised the promise of decentralised finance, this legal battle could mark a significant fall from grace.
Roger Ver’s case represents a seminal moment in the crossed paths of crypto and taxation.
It highlights the complexities of applying traditional tax frameworks to modern assets and the importance of accurate reporting in an era where digital currencies are becoming mainstream.
For individuals considering expatriation or those heavily involved in cryptocurrency, this case serves as a stark reminder of the risks and responsibilities.
If you have any queries about this article on Bitcoin Jesus and the expatriation tax, or tax matters in the United States, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here..
Yes, Austria has specific legislation for the taxation of crypto-assets.
The rules were introduced in 2022 as part of the Austrian Income Tax Act.
When you exchange crypto-assets for conventional fiat currency – such as USD, EUR, or GBP – any capital gains you make are taxable.
The taxable amount is the difference between the value received and the tax acquisition cost of the crypto-asset.
This is taxed at a rate of 27.5%.
Exchanges of crypto-assets for goods, services, or FIAT currency are treated the same for tax purposes—they trigger the realisation of capital gains.
However, exchanging one crypto-asset for another (for example BTC to ETH to SOL) is different.
In this case, no capital gains are realised immediately.
Instead, the crypto-asset you receive inherits the tax acquisition cost of the one you gave up, deferring taxation until a later event.
The distinction between professional and casual crypto trading depends on general Austrian income tax rules.
Casual traders are those managing private assets.
However, if someone invests significant time and effort into trading crypto-assets, aiming for income beyond what casual management would yield, they may be considered a professional trader.
Professional income is taxed differently from capital returns.
Indicators include the number of trades and investments in specialised equipment.
Losses from crypto-assets must be offset in the same tax year they are realised. They cannot be carried forward to future tax years.
No, NFTs are not subject to the special tax rules for crypto-assets.
They are treated like movable assets.
Selling an NFT within one year of acquisition qualifies as “speculative trading” and is taxed at progressive income tax rates.
Income from mining is treated as current income and taxed at 27.5%.
Mined crypto-assets are valued at EUR 0 for tax purposes.
When these assets are sold for FIAT currency, any increase in value is taxed as realised capital gains.
Yes.
Income from crypto-assets must be declared to the tax authorities after the tax year ends, following general tax rules.
Starting 1 January 2024, Austrian crypto-asset service providers must calculate, withhold, and remit taxes on crypto income directly to the authorities.
Currently, there are no additional specific provisions regarding the taxation of crypto-assets in Austria.
If you have any queries on this article on Crypto Tax in Austria, or crypto tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an international organisation that works to promote economic growth, trade, and development across its 38 member countries.
The OECD was founded in 1961, and its mission is to help countries improve their economies and the well-being of their citizens.
One of the OECD’s main roles is to create international standards and guidelines for tax policies, trade practices, and economic cooperation.
It plays a key role in global tax reform, especially through initiatives like Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and the development of the Global Minimum Tax.
The OECD provides a forum for governments to discuss and coordinate economic policies.
It collects and publishes data on a wide range of economic issues, such as tax policies, trade, and social programs.
The OECD also creates guidelines and recommendations that help countries improve their tax systems, reduce poverty, and promote sustainable growth.
In recent years, the OECD has been leading efforts to combat tax avoidance by multinational companies through its BEPS initiative.
This initiative aims to close loopholes in international tax laws and ensure that companies pay taxes where they earn their profits.
The OECD is important because it helps countries work together to solve global economic problems.
By creating international standards and encouraging cooperation, they help to create a more stable and fair global economy.
In the area of taxation, the OECD’s work has been instrumental in tackling the challenges of globalisation and the digital economy.
Its Pillar One and Pillar Two initiatives aim to ensure that large multinational companies pay their fair share of taxes and that countries can collect the tax revenue they need to support public services.
The OECD plays a crucial role in shaping international economic policy.
Through its work on tax reform, trade, and economic development, they help countries create policies that promote growth, reduce inequality, and ensure that companies contribute fairly to the global economy.
If you have any queries about this article, then please get in touch.
A Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is a tax relief mechanism that allows individuals or businesses to reduce their tax liability in their home country by the amount of tax they’ve already paid to a foreign country.
This is an important tool in international taxation because it prevents double taxation — being taxed on the same income in two different countries.
Let’s say you’re a company based in the UK, but you also earn profits in Germany.
Germany will tax you on the income you make in their country, but the UK also expects you to pay tax on your global income.
Without the Foreign Tax Credit, you would be paying tax on the same income twice—once in Germany and once in the UK.
The FTC works by allowing you to reduce your UK tax bill by the amount of tax you already paid in Germany.
So, if Germany taxed you £10,000 on your foreign income, you could subtract that £10,000 from your UK tax liability.
There are some limitations to how much tax you can credit. For example:
Foreign Tax Credits are crucial for businesses and individuals who earn income abroad.
Without this credit, companies and people working internationally would face double taxation, making cross-border business much more expensive and complicated.
The FTC encourages international trade and investment by reducing the tax burden on cross-border income.
Foreign Tax Credits are an essential feature of international tax systems, ensuring that individuals and businesses aren’t taxed twice on the same income.
By allowing taxpayers to reduce their home country’s tax liability by the amount of tax they’ve already paid abroad, the FTC promotes fair taxation and encourages international trade.
If you have any queries on this article – what are foreign tax credits – or any other tax matters, then please get in touch.
Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) is a tax transparency measure introduced by the OECD as part of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative.
CbCR requires large multinational companies to report detailed information about their operations, profits, and taxes paid in each country where they do business.
This information is then shared with tax authorities to help them detect tax avoidance practices, such as profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.
CbCR applies to multinational companies with global revenues of more than €750 million.
These companies must file an annual CbCR report that provides a breakdown of their income, profits, taxes paid, and other economic activities in each country where they operate.
For example, if a company has subsidiaries in 10 different countries, it must provide information on how much revenue each subsidiary earns, how much profit it makes, and how much tax it pays in each country.
This level of detail helps tax authorities identify where a company might be shifting profits to avoid taxes.
as introduced as part of the OECD’s effort to tackle tax avoidance by multinational companies.
Before CbCR, it was difficult for tax authorities to see the full picture of a company’s global operations.
By requiring companies to disclose their activities on a country-by-country basis, CbCR gives tax authorities the information they need to detect tax avoidance schemes.
This reporting helps ensure that multinational companies are paying their fair share of taxes in the countries where they actually do business, rather than shifting profits to tax havens.
Country-by-Country Reporting is a critical tool for improving tax transparency and combating tax avoidance.
By requiring large multinational companies to report detailed information about their global operations,
CbCR helps tax authorities ensure that companies are paying their fair share of taxes and operating in a fair and transparent manner.
If you have any queries about this article – What is country by country reporting? – then please do get in touch.
The OECD has published new technical guidelines to assist countries in implementing the global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%.
This initiative aims to ensure that multinational corporations contribute a fair share of taxes, regardless of where they operate.
The technical guidance addresses several challenges, including calculating effective tax rates, identifying low-tax jurisdictions, and handling cross-border complexities.
It also provides a framework for dispute resolution between nations.
The guidelines will require multinationals to reassess their tax strategies, particularly those involving low-tax jurisdictions.
Compliance costs are expected to rise, but the rules aim to create a more level playing field globally.
Countries with tax-friendly regimes may resist adopting these guidelines, fearing a loss of competitiveness.
Additionally, differing interpretations of the rules could lead to disputes between jurisdictions.
The OECD’s technical guidance is a significant step towards implementing a global minimum tax. While challenges remain, this initiative represents a milestone in international tax cooperation.
If you have any queries about this article on OECD’s global minimum tax guidelines, or tax matters in OECD member states, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in OECD member states and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
President-elect Donald Trump has announced plans to impose significant tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Citing concerns over illegal immigration and drug trafficking, particularly fentanyl, these measures aim to address national security issues.
However, they also raise questions about potential economic repercussions and international relations.
The proposed tariffs include a 25% tax on all products imported from Canada and Mexico, and an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods.
These measures are intended to pressure these countries into taking more stringent actions against illegal activities affecting the US.
The tariffs are set to be implemented through executive orders upon Trump’s inauguration.
Mexico and Canada have expressed concerns over the proposed tariffs.
Mexican President Sheinbaum warned of possible retaliation and emphasized the need for negotiations to avoid a trade war.
Canadian officials highlighted their ongoing efforts against drug trafficking and expressed a desire to maintain strong trade relations.
China, on the other hand, suggested the mutual benefits of trade cooperation and denounced the threat of a trade war.
Economists warn that such tariffs could disrupt existing trade agreements, lead to higher consumer prices, and negatively impact industries reliant on cross-border supply chains.
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) could be particularly affected, potentially leading to inflation and economic instability.
The proposed tariffs represent a strategic move to address national security concerns but carry significant economic risks.
Balancing these factors will be crucial in determining the overall impact of these measures on the U.S. economy and its international relationships.
If you have any queries about this article on US tariff threats, or tax matters in the United States, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, there is more information on membership here.
The OECD has introduced a new Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) designed to enhance transparency and combat tax evasion in the cryptocurrency market.
This framework represents a significant step forward in addressing the tax challenges posed by digital assets.
The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework requires crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and other intermediaries to report transactions and account balances to tax authorities.
This information will then be shared among jurisdictions through the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard.
Crypto users in participating jurisdictions will face increased scrutiny of their transactions.
This may lead to higher compliance costs but is expected to reduce the misuse of cryptocurrencies for tax evasion and other illicit activities.
The CARF aims to standardise the treatment of crypto assets across jurisdictions, making it easier for governments to track and tax digital transactions.
However, countries with lax regulations may still pose challenges to enforcement.
The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is a game-changer for the regulation of digital assets.
While it may create additional burdens for crypto users and businesses, its long-term benefits for transparency and tax compliance are undeniable.
If you have any queries about this article on OECD’s crypto reporting framework, or tax matters in crypto-friendly jurisdictions, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in crypto-friendly jurisdictions and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.