Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
Donald Trump’s re-election as US president has sparked widespread speculation about potential shifts in US trade and tax policies.
Countries in Asia are particularly concerned about the implications for regional trade, foreign investment, and tax agreements.
Let’s explore what this means for Asia and its economic future.
Trump’s presidency is expected to bring significant changes to U.S. economic policies, including:
Asian governments and businesses are taking steps to mitigate potential risks:
While challenges are inevitable, Trump’s re-election also presents opportunities.
For example, countries that can position themselves as alternatives to China for manufacturing may attract increased foreign investment.
Asia faces a mixed outlook as it prepares for potential policy shifts under Donald Trump’s presidency.
By focusing on diversification and regional cooperation, the region can navigate these challenges and capitalise on new opportunities.
If you have any queries about this article on US policy shifts, or tax matters in Asia, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Asia and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Italy’s proposed tax increase on cryptocurrency trading is facing significant changes, with the government leaning toward a lower tax rate than initially suggested.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s coalition is reportedly backing an amendment to reduce the tax hike, responding to concerns from crypto executives and industry stakeholders.
This shift highlights the ongoing debate over how to balance public finances with fostering a competitive digital asset market.
The initial proposal in Italy’s recent budget suggested increasing the tax on crypto trading from 26% to 42%.
However, the League, a junior partner in Meloni’s coalition, has put forward an amendment to limit this increase to 28%.
This proposal reflects concerns that a steep hike would make Italy less attractive for crypto businesses compared to other European Union countries.
Forza Italia, another coalition partner founded by the late Silvio Berlusconi, has introduced a separate amendment. This proposal seeks to:
Both proposals are under consideration, with sources indicating the government is likely to favor the League’s amendment.
As part of the League’s proposal, a permanent working group would be established.
This group, comprising digital asset firms and consumer associations, aims to educate investors about cryptocurrency.
Additionally, Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti has hinted at implementing a tax structure based on the duration of crypto investments, offering a more nuanced approach to taxation.
Italy faces a challenging fiscal landscape, with low economic growth and rising public debt.
While the government is keen to bolster public finances, the proposed tax hike sparked backlash for potentially stifling an emerging sector.
India’s experience serves as a cautionary tale.
When India imposed significant crypto taxes in 2022, domestic trading volumes plummeted as investors migrated to offshore platforms.
Italy risks a similar exodus if tax rates are perceived as excessively high.
The European Union is preparing to implement its first bloc-wide crypto regulations under the Markets in Cryptoassets (MiCA) framework.
As these rules come into effect, individual member states must strike a balance between aligning with EU standards and maintaining competitiveness.
Italy’s debate over crypto taxation highlights the complexities of regulating a rapidly evolving industry.
While the government is under pressure to improve its fiscal position, overly aggressive tax policies could undermine the country’s appeal to investors.
The proposed amendments reflect an effort to find middle ground, balancing fiscal responsibility with the need to support the growing crypto sector.
If you have any queries about this article on Italy’s crypto tax proposals, or tax matters in Italy, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Italy and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
The Top-Up Tax is a key part of the OECD’s global tax reform, specifically under Pillar Two.
It is designed to ensure that multinational companies pay a minimum tax rate of 15% on their profits, even if they are operating in countries with lower tax rates.
The Top-Up Tax applies to profits that are taxed below the 15% threshold.
If a company is paying less than 15% tax in a particular country, the Top-Up Tax allows other countries to collect additional taxes to bring the total tax rate up to the minimum level.
Let’s say a company has a subsidiary in a country where the corporate tax rate is only 10%.
Under the Top-Up Tax rules, the company’s home country can impose an extra 5% tax on the profits earned in that country, making sure the company’s total tax rate meets the global minimum of 15%.
This system prevents companies from taking advantage of tax havens or countries with very low taxes, as they will always end up paying at least 15% on their profits, regardless of where those profits are earned.
The Top-Up Tax mainly affects large multinational companies with global revenues of more than €750 million.
Smaller companies that operate within one country are not impacted by this rule.
The tax is part of a broader effort by the OECD to reduce tax avoidance by multinational companies, which often shift their profits to low-tax jurisdictions to reduce their overall tax bills.
The Top-Up Tax is important because it helps create a fairer global tax system.
By ensuring that all large companies pay at least 15% tax on their profits, it reduces the incentive for companies to move their profits to tax havens or low-tax countries.
This tax reform is also expected to generate more revenue for governments, allowing them to fund important public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
The Top-Up Tax is a powerful tool in the fight against tax avoidance.
By ensuring that multinational companies pay a minimum tax rate of 15%, it helps create a fairer tax system and ensures that countries can collect the tax revenue they need to support their economies.
If you have any queries about this article on What is the Top-Up Tax? – or other tax matters – then please do get in touch.
A tax haven is a country or jurisdiction that offers very low or no taxes to individuals and businesses.
Tax havens also often have strict privacy laws, making it difficult for other countries’ tax authorities to find out who is holding money there or how much income they’re earning.
These features make tax havens attractive to people and companies who want to reduce their tax bills by moving profits or wealth offshore.
Many multinational companies use tax havens to reduce their overall tax bills by moving profits to these low-tax jurisdictions.
For example, a company might establish a subsidiary in a tax haven, shift its profits to that subsidiary, and avoid paying higher taxes in the countries where it actually does business.
Individuals also use tax havens to avoid paying taxes on their wealth.
By moving money to a tax haven, they can often keep their income hidden from their home country’s tax authorities.
Tax havens are often criticized for enabling tax avoidance and contributing to global inequality.
When companies and wealthy individuals use tax havens to reduce their tax bills, it deprives governments of the revenue they need to fund public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
Efforts are being made by organisations like the OECD and European Union to crack down on tax havens and make it harder for individuals and companies to use them to avoid paying taxes.
Tax havens play a significant role in international tax avoidance, but they are increasingly under scrutiny.
As global efforts to combat tax avoidance ramp up, the role of tax havens is likely to decline, but they remain a key part of the discussion on how to ensure fair taxation across borders.
If you have any queries about this article on ‘what is a tax haven?’ – or any queries at all – then please do not hesitate to get in touch.
On 9 October 2024, Luxembourg’s government introduced its 2025 draft Budget law (number 8444) to the Luxembourg Parliament, referred to as the Draft Law.
This Budget aims to make Luxembourg’s economy more competitive, strengthen its financial centre, and improve the purchasing power of households.
In this article, we explore the key tax changes proposed in the Budget and what they mean for individuals and businesses.
The Luxembourg government proposes a reduction in the taxable base for registration and transcription duties on real estate transactions. This change is aimed at boosting the housing market. Here’s how it works:
To qualify for this reduction, the property must:
For those buying real estate between 1 October 2024 and when the Draft Law officially comes into force, a written request for a recalculation of duties must be submitted to the relevant authorities.
The reduction applies between 1 October 2024 and 30 June 2025.
In line with Luxembourg’s environmental goals, the Draft Law includes an increase of €24 to the CO₂ tax credit, bringing it to €192 starting from 1 January 2025.
This tax credit is designed to offset the impact of the CO₂ tax on individuals with low or moderate incomes, aligning with Luxembourg’s environmental commitment while supporting household finances.
The Draft Law also references additional measures initially proposed in draft law number 8414, dated 17 July 2024, which include:
These additional measures are designed to complement Luxembourg’s broader fiscal goals, aiming to foster economic growth and maintain Luxembourg’s competitive edge as a financial centre.
Luxembourg’s 2025 Budget brings forward several significant tax changes with the potential to benefit both the real estate market and individuals.
The reduction in real estate duties is expected to encourage housing investment, while the increased CO₂ tax credit aims to make environmentally friendly policies more affordable for lower- to middle-income residents.
Together with the personal and corporate income tax changes, these adjustments reflect Luxembourg’s commitment to economic resilience and sustainability.
If you have any queries about this article on Luxembourg’s 2025 Budget or tax matters in Luxembourg, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Luxembourg and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, there is more information on membership here.
In a recent case, Denmark issued a ruling on the concept of Permanent Establishment (PE), which has important implications for businesses that operate across borders.
This ruling followed a case involving a Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark, raising questions about when a business is deemed to have a PE in a foreign country.
The ruling highlights the importance of understanding the concept of PE, as it can determine whether a company is liable to pay tax in a particular country.
Permanent Establishment refers to the situation where a business has a sufficient physical presence in a foreign country, making it liable to pay tax on its profits in that country.
PE can take many forms, such as having an office, factory, or even just a representative working in a foreign country.
The exact definition of PE can vary from one country to another, but the principle is the same: if a business is operating in a country for a certain period of time, it may be required to pay taxes there.
In this particular case, the CEO of a Swedish company was working part-time in Denmark, raising questions about whether the company had established a PE in Denmark.
The Danish tax authorities argued that the company had a PE in Denmark because the CEO was regularly conducting business activities in the country.
The company, however, claimed that the CEO’s presence in Denmark was not enough to constitute a PE.
The Danish court ultimately ruled that the company did have a PE in Denmark, as the CEO’s work in the country went beyond a mere temporary presence.
This ruling has important implications for businesses with employees who work remotely or travel frequently between countries.
The Danish ruling on Permanent Establishment serves as an important reminder for businesses operating internationally.
Companies need to carefully assess their operations in foreign countries to determine whether they have a PE and may be required to pay tax there.
The rise of remote work and cross-border business activities has made this issue more relevant than ever.
If you have any queries about this article on Denmark Permanent Establishment Rules, or tax matters in Denmark, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Denmark and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Brazil is known for having one of the most complex tax systems in the world, which often poses challenges for businesses trying to operate efficiently.
The country’s VAT system, or Value Added Tax, has been a significant area of concern due to its multilayered structure.
Recognising this, the Brazilian government has introduced new reforms aimed at simplifying VAT compliance and making it easier for businesses to navigate the tax system.
These reforms are intended to enhance Brazil’s competitiveness in the global market by reducing the administrative burden on companies.
VAT is a tax on the value added to goods and services at each stage of the production and distribution process.
In Brazil, VAT is administered at multiple levels—federal, state, and municipal—each imposing different taxes.
This makes compliance difficult and costly for businesses, as they need to keep track of various tax rates, deadlines, and regulations depending on the jurisdiction they operate in.
Brazil’s VAT system includes a combination of taxes, such as:
The multiple layers of taxation often lead to confusion, especially for companies that operate across state lines or provide services in different municipalities.
The complexity also results in frequent disputes between businesses and tax authorities, which can delay business operations and increase costs.
The existing VAT system has long been criticised for being overly complicated and inefficient.
The reform aims to simplify the process by reducing the number of taxes and consolidating the different tax rates into a more uniform structure.
This will not only reduce the administrative burden on businesses but also encourage compliance and reduce the likelihood of tax disputes.
The VAT reform is also seen as crucial to improving Brazil’s standing in the global business community.
As Brazil looks to attract more foreign investment, simplifying the tax system is an important step in making the country more appealing to multinational corporations.
Brazil’s VAT reforms are a welcome development for businesses operating in the country.
By simplifying the tax system, the government hopes to reduce the administrative burden on companies and encourage greater compliance.
These changes are expected to improve Brazil’s competitiveness in the global market, attracting more foreign investment and helping local businesses grow.
If you have any queries about this article on Brazil’s VAT reforms, or tax matters in Brazil, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Brazil and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
India is making substantial changes to its transfer pricing rules, with the aim of making its tax system more competitive and easier to navigate for multinational corporations.
These reforms are expected to simplify compliance and attract more foreign investment.
Transfer pricing refers to the rules governing how related companies price goods, services, or intellectual property transferred across borders.
Transfer pricing is the method by which goods, services, or intellectual property are priced when they are transferred between different entities within the same multinational group.
These prices can significantly affect the tax liabilities of companies in different jurisdictions, as shifting profits between countries with different tax rates can lower a company’s overall tax burden.
India has traditionally had a complex and burdensome transfer pricing system, which has led to a high volume of tax disputes between multinational companies and the Indian tax authorities.
The new reforms aim to simplify the system, reducing the risk of disputes and encouraging foreign businesses to invest in India.
The reforms also bring India closer in line with the OECD’s guidelines on transfer pricing, which are used by many countries around the world.
One of the most significant changes is the introduction of bilateral APAs.
This allows companies to agree on transfer pricing rules with the Indian tax authorities in advance, providing more certainty and reducing the likelihood of future disputes.
The reforms also streamline the documentation requirements for businesses, making it easier for them to comply with the rules and avoid penalties.
Clearly, by implementing these changes, India hopes to make the country more attractive for foreign investment.
If you have any queries about this article on transfer pricing, or tax matters in India, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in India and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
Amazon’s tax practices in the UK have been under the spotlight for many years, with criticism frequently aimed at the tech giant for its minimal corporation tax payments.
In recent years, Amazon paid very little in taxes due to the utilisation of a government tax break, which has now expired.
This development has led to Amazon paying corporation tax for the first time since 2020, marking a significant shift in both the company’s approach to tax and the broader UK tax policy landscape.
Amazon operates globally, with the UK being one of its key markets.
Historically, like many multinational companies, Amazon has faced criticism for taking advantage of legal tax avoidance strategies.
These strategies often involved reporting profits in low-tax jurisdictions such as Luxembourg, while paying relatively little tax in high-tax markets like the UK.
It is claimed that one of the main tools Amazon and other companies had been using in recent years to reduce their UK tax burden had been Rishi Sunak’s much vaunted “Super Deduction”.
The relief allowed for 130% corporation deduction for qualifying expenditure on qualifying plant and machinery in a two year period beginning in April 2021.
This change in Amazon’s tax payments also aligns with a global push for fairer taxation of multinational companies.
The OECD’s Pillar Two reforms, which aim to introduce a global minimum tax rate of 15%, have garnered widespread support.
These reforms are designed to stop companies from shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions, ensuring that all multinationals, including tech giants like Amazon, contribute a fair share to the countries in which they generate significant revenue.
Amazon’s recent corporation tax payment in the UK is a reflection of both changes in UK tax policy and global efforts to reform corporate taxation.
With governments across the world, including the UK, pushing for greater tax transparency and compliance from large multinationals, we may see further shifts in how companies like Amazon structure their global tax strategies.
If you have any queries about this article on Amazon UK’s corporation tax, or tax matters in the UK, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UK and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, there is more information on membership here.
Transfer pricing refers to the rules and methods used to determine the prices of transactions between related companies, such as subsidiaries of a multinational corporation.
When one subsidiary of a company sells goods or services to another subsidiary, the price at which this transaction occurs is called the transfer price.
These rules exist to ensure that companies price these transactions fairly and in line with the arm’s length principle, meaning the prices should be similar to what independent companies would charge each other.
Transfer pricing is important because it affects how much tax a company pays in each country where it operates.
If a company sets its transfer prices too low or too high, it can shift profits from high-tax countries to low-tax countries, reducing its overall tax bill.
This practice can lead to base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), where countries lose tax revenue because profits are moved to tax havens.
Governments and tax authorities around the world use transfer pricing rules to prevent this type of tax avoidance and ensure that companies pay their fair share of taxes.
Let’s say a multinational company has a subsidiary in Country A, where the tax rate is high, and another subsidiary in Country B, where the tax rate is low.
The company might try to shift its profits to Country B by setting a low transfer price for goods or services sold from the subsidiary in Country A to the subsidiary in Country B.
This would reduce the profits reported in Country A (where the taxes are high) and increase the profits in Country B (where the taxes are low).
To prevent this, tax authorities require companies to set their transfer prices according to the arm’s length principle.
This means that the price should be the same as it would be if the transaction were between unrelated companies, ensuring that each country gets its fair share of tax revenue.
Transfer pricing is a critical aspect of international tax law because it helps prevent companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries.
By ensuring that transactions between related companies are priced fairly, transfer pricing rules help create a more level playing field for businesses and ensure that governments can collect the taxes they are owed.
If you have any queries about this article, or international tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.