Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
Brazil is known for having one of the most complex tax systems in the world, which often poses challenges for businesses trying to operate efficiently.
The country’s VAT system, or Value Added Tax, has been a significant area of concern due to its multilayered structure.
Recognising this, the Brazilian government has introduced new reforms aimed at simplifying VAT compliance and making it easier for businesses to navigate the tax system.
These reforms are intended to enhance Brazil’s competitiveness in the global market by reducing the administrative burden on companies.
VAT is a tax on the value added to goods and services at each stage of the production and distribution process.
In Brazil, VAT is administered at multiple levels—federal, state, and municipal—each imposing different taxes.
This makes compliance difficult and costly for businesses, as they need to keep track of various tax rates, deadlines, and regulations depending on the jurisdiction they operate in.
Brazil’s VAT system includes a combination of taxes, such as:
The multiple layers of taxation often lead to confusion, especially for companies that operate across state lines or provide services in different municipalities.
The complexity also results in frequent disputes between businesses and tax authorities, which can delay business operations and increase costs.
The existing VAT system has long been criticised for being overly complicated and inefficient.
The reform aims to simplify the process by reducing the number of taxes and consolidating the different tax rates into a more uniform structure.
This will not only reduce the administrative burden on businesses but also encourage compliance and reduce the likelihood of tax disputes.
The VAT reform is also seen as crucial to improving Brazil’s standing in the global business community.
As Brazil looks to attract more foreign investment, simplifying the tax system is an important step in making the country more appealing to multinational corporations.
Brazil’s VAT reforms are a welcome development for businesses operating in the country.
By simplifying the tax system, the government hopes to reduce the administrative burden on companies and encourage greater compliance.
These changes are expected to improve Brazil’s competitiveness in the global market, attracting more foreign investment and helping local businesses grow.
If you have any queries about this article on Brazil’s VAT reforms, or tax matters in Brazil, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Brazil and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.
The UK tax authority, HMRC, has released new guidance for businesses on VAT compliance.
These guidelines aim to help businesses avoid common mistakes when dealing with VAT, which is a tax applied to most goods and services in the UK.
By following these guidelines, businesses can ensure that they comply with tax laws and avoid penalties.
This article will walk you through the importance of the new guidance and the areas it covers, such as transfer pricing and VAT controls.
VAT (Value Added Tax) is a consumption tax that is charged at each stage of the supply chain. It is ultimately paid by the end consumer but collected by businesses.
Most businesses need to register for VAT once their taxable turnover exceeds £90,000 per year (before 1 April 2024 it was £85,000).
There are different VAT rates in the UK, depending on the product or service being sold. Some goods are taxed at the standard rate of 20%, while others, like children’s car seats or home energy, are taxed at a reduced rate of 5%.
Certain items, such as most food and children’s clothes, are zero-rated, meaning they are not taxed at all.
VAT is one of the most complicated taxes that businesses have to deal with.
Many businesses struggle with issues like applying the correct VAT rate or filing their VAT returns on time.
In response to these difficulties, HMRC has issued updated guidelines that clarify how businesses should handle VAT.
The guidance provides specific advice on common pitfalls such as incorrect invoicing or not registering for VAT when necessary.
Additionally, HMRC has outlined the importance of transfer pricing in VAT compliance, especially for multinational businesses operating across borders.
The new VAT compliance guidelines from HMRC provide much-needed clarity for businesses dealing with the complexities of VAT.
They are particularly useful for companies involved in international trade, as they explain how transfer pricing can impact VAT obligations.
Following these guidelines will help businesses avoid costly penalties and ensure they are fully compliant with UK tax laws.
If you have any queries about this article on VAT compliance, or tax matters in the UK, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the UK and would be interested in sharing your knowledge there is more information on membership here.
China’s VAT rebate program is to be expanded to support its export sector.
This is a major policy shift aimed at helping businesses that export goods, especially in light of global economic challenges and reduced demand in some markets.
In this article, we’ll explore what VAT rebates are, why China is expanding this program, and how this could benefit businesses both inside and outside of China.
In many countries, VAT is charged on goods and services as a way to collect tax from consumers. However, when goods are exported, they are often exempt from VAT.
To make sure that exporters aren’t unfairly taxed, governments often offer VAT rebates.
These rebates refund the VAT that was paid when the goods were produced, allowing businesses to recover the tax paid on inputs (like raw materials and manufacturing costs).
For exporters, VAT rebates can significantly reduce costs and increase profits, making their goods more competitive in international markets.
China’s economy has faced several challenges in recent years, including trade tensions, the COVID-19 pandemic, and global inflation.
These factors have put pressure on Chinese exporters, who are struggling with rising production costs and slowing demand from key trading partners.
By expanding its VAT rebate program, China aims to boost its export sector by making it cheaper for companies to produce goods for export.
This policy will give businesses more cash flow by refunding the VAT they paid during production, which could be reinvested into their operations or used to lower prices, making Chinese goods more competitive globally.
While the exact amount of VAT rebates varies depending on the type of goods being exported, the Chinese government has hinted that the rebate program will be expanded to cover a wider range of goods.
This means more industries will benefit from VAT rebates, especially those in manufacturing, electronics, and textiles.
The rebates are likely to be increased to 13%, which is the standard VAT rate in China. This will allow exporters to recover nearly all the VAT they paid when producing goods for international markets.
For Chinese businesses, this expanded VAT rebate program is a lifeline. It will help them reduce costs and make their goods more competitive in global markets, particularly in sectors where price is a key factor in attracting buyers.
The rebates will also boost profitability and give companies more financial flexibility in a challenging economic environment.
For foreign businesses that import goods from China, this could mean lower prices on Chinese-made products, as exporters may pass on some of the savings from the VAT rebates to their customers.
This is especially important for industries like retail and electronics, which rely heavily on Chinese imports.
China’s decision to expand its VAT rebate program is a significant step towards supporting its export-driven economy.
By giving businesses more financial relief, China hopes to keep its goods competitive in the global marketplace, especially in industries that have been hit hard by rising costs and weakening demand.
For exporters, this policy could provide much-needed support as they navigate a complex global economy.
If you have any queries about this article on China’s VAT rebate program, or tax matters in China, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in China and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
India has introduced new Goods and Services Tax (GST) regulations targeting e-commerce platforms.
The updates include stricter rules around GST collection at source (TCS) and increased penalties for non-compliance.
This is part of India’s broader effort to improve tax compliance and ensure that digital businesses operating in the country are meeting their tax obligations.
GST (Goods and Services Tax) is a comprehensive tax applied to the sale of goods and services in India. TCS (Tax Collected at Source) is a system where the e-commerce platform collects GST on behalf of sellers and then remits it to the government. This ensures that tax is collected at the point of sale, reducing the risk of evasion.
India’s latest GST updates include:
India’s digital economy has been growing rapidly, and the government is keen to ensure that all businesses, including those operating online, pay their fair share of taxes.
The new GST rules are designed to close loopholes that some e-commerce platforms have used to reduce their tax liabilities.
Platforms like Amazon India, Flipkart, and other digital services will need to review their tax compliance procedures.
The increased reporting requirements may result in higher administrative costs for these companies, but they are also likely to reduce the risk of tax audits and penalties.
India’s new GST regulations for e-commerce platforms represent a significant step towards improving tax compliance in the digital economy.
These changes will ensure that online businesses contribute fairly to the tax system while making it harder for companies to evade their obligations.
If you have any queries about this article on India’s GST update, or tax matters in India, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in India and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
Australia is updating its Goods and Services Tax (GST) rules, with a focus on cross-border digital services.
These changes require foreign companies that provide digital services to Australian consumers—such as streaming platforms, software providers, and online content services—to register for GST and collect the tax from their customers.
Under the new rules, any company that provides digital services to Australian consumers must:
This new regulation expands the scope of GST to cover not only goods but also digital services, meaning companies like Netflix, Spotify, and Amazon Web Services will all be subject to the tax.
Australia’s digital economy has grown rapidly in recent years, with many Australians using streaming services, software subscriptions, and other online platforms.
However, foreign companies that provide these services have been able to avoid paying Australian taxes because they do not have a physical presence in the country.
These new rules are designed to close this loophole and ensure that all businesses operating in Australia’s digital market contribute to the country’s tax base.
For foreign companies, these new rules will increase administrative costs as they will need to set up systems to collect and remit GST.
Companies that do not comply with the new regulations may face penalties or fines from the ATO.
On the other hand, this move will help level the playing field for domestic digital service providers, who already have to pay GST on their services.
Australia’s decision to extend GST to cross-border digital services is part of a broader trend towards taxing the digital economy.
These changes will ensure that foreign companies contribute fairly to the Australian tax system, while also boosting the government’s revenue from the rapidly growing digital sector.
If you have any queries about this article on Australia’s GST rules for digital services, or tax matters in Australia, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Australia and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch.
There is more information on membership here.
Value Added Tax (VAT) is a type of tax that’s added to most goods and services that are sold.
In many countries, businesses collect VAT from their customers and then pay it to the government.
Recently, Switzerland decided to require online platforms to collect VAT on behalf of sellers, similar to rules in the European Union.
Switzerland is following the lead of the EU in making sure that online platforms like Amazon and eBay collect VAT on the goods sold by independent sellers.
Before this rule, it was up to the sellers themselves to collect and pay the VAT. However, not all sellers complied, and this led to lost tax revenue.
By shifting the responsibility to platforms, Switzerland aims to make sure that VAT is properly collected and paid. This helps ensure a fairer tax system and increases government revenue.
Under the new rule, if an online platform facilitates a sale between a Swiss buyer and an independent seller, the platform must collect VAT on behalf of the seller and pay it to the Swiss government.
This applies to both Swiss-based sellers and sellers from other countries selling to Swiss customers.
This change is important because it makes it harder for sellers to avoid paying VAT. It also levels the playing field for Swiss businesses, which have always had to collect and pay VAT on their sales.
For sellers, this rule means they no longer have to worry about collecting VAT themselves. However, it also means they may have to adjust their prices to include the VAT collected by the platform.
For online platforms, this rule adds extra work, as they need to update their systems to comply with the new VAT requirements.
However, platforms are used to these types of rules, especially in the EU, so most should be able to adjust without too much difficulty.
Switzerland’s new VAT rule for online platforms is a step towards stronger tax compliance.
By requiring platforms to collect VAT, Switzerland ensures that sellers pay their fair share of taxes while making the system simpler for both businesses and the government.
Final thoughts
If you have any queries about this article, Swiss Platforms Required to Collect VAT from Online Sellers, or tax matters in Switzerland more generally, then please get in touch.
In a significant ruling that could have widespread implications for taxpayers across the UAE, the Abu Dhabi Cassation Court has delivered a judgment that clarifies the rights of taxpayers in recovering Value Added Tax (VAT) from non-compliant suppliers.
The ruling, issued on 8 August 2024, in Case No. 648/2024, addresses a common issue where the UAE Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has historically rejected VAT refund requests due to suppliers failing to provide compliant tax invoices.
This decision now opens the door for taxpayers to seek financial recourse from suppliers, potentially reclaiming substantial amounts of VAT.
The case involved a construction company that issued a cheque to a supplier as a guarantee for VAT related to a construction project.
The dispute arose when the FTA rejected the company’s VAT refund request, citing a lack of proper documentation—specifically, the necessary VAT invoices from the supplier.
Under UAE VAT Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017), businesses are entitled to recover input tax (VAT paid on goods and services) provided they possess a valid tax invoice.
However, strict compliance with the invoicing requirements, as detailed in Article 59 of the Executive Regulations, is crucial.
Non-compliance has frequently led to the FTA rejecting VAT refund requests, leaving businesses with significant unrecovered VAT liabilities.
In this particular case, the construction company was unable to submit compliant invoices within the required timeframe, leading to the FTA’s rejection of their refund claim. Consequently, the company initiated legal action to recover the VAT from the supplier who had failed to provide the necessary documentation.
The Abu Dhabi Cassation Court’s decision is a pivotal moment in UAE tax law, establishing that taxpayers have a clear legal path to recover VAT amounts from suppliers when refund claims are denied due to non-compliance.
The court upheld the principle that if a supplier issues a non-compliant tax invoice and this results in the FTA rejecting the taxpayer’s VAT refund claim, the taxpayer is entitled to reclaim the corresponding amount from the supplier.
The court’s reasoning was based on the supplier’s obligations under UAE VAT Law.
It emphasized that issuing a compliant tax invoice is a statutory requirement, and failing to do so can have serious financial consequences for the purchaser.
In this case, the court found that the supplier’s failure to provide the necessary VAT invoices within the stipulated period directly led to the FTA’s decision to deny the refund.
As a result, the court ruled that the taxpayer could recover the lost VAT from the supplier.
Moreover, the court underscored the principle of equity, asserting that the financial burden resulting from non-compliance should not fall on the taxpayer.
Instead, the supplier, who failed to meet their legal obligations, should bear the responsibility.
This ruling has significant implications for both taxpayers and suppliers in the UAE:
This decision offers a vital remedy in situations where VAT refunds are denied due to the supplier’s non-compliance with invoicing requirements.
Taxpayers now have a clear legal avenue to seek compensation directly from suppliers, ensuring they are not financially penalised for issues beyond their control.
The ruling serves as a strong warning to suppliers about the importance of adhering to VAT invoicing standards.
Suppliers must ensure that their tax invoices meet the FTA’s requirements, as failure to do so could lead to substantial financial liabilities, including the need to reimburse clients for denied VAT refunds.
The Abu Dhabi Cassation Court’s ruling in Case No. 648/2024 marks a landmark moment in the UAE’s tax landscape.
It reinforces the critical importance of compliance with VAT regulations and provides a robust legal mechanism for taxpayers to recover amounts denied by the FTA due to non-compliant supplier invoices.
Both taxpayers and suppliers should pay close attention to this ruling and its potential impact on their financial and operational practices.
If you have any queries about this article, UAE Court Allows VAT Recovery, then please do get in touch.
On March 28, 2024, the Diet passed the bill implementing the 2024 tax reform proposals, ushering in changes that broaden the scope of foreign business operators subject to Japanese consumption tax (JCT).
The 2024 Tax Reform introduces significant amendments to the Japanese consumption tax regime:
Previously, a business operator became taxable if their taxable transactions exceeded JPY 10 million in the base period. Under the reform, foreign business operators established for more than two years are deemed taxable if their share capital is at least JPY 10 million (or equivalent) upon commencing operations in Japan.
While offshore developers of digital content were already required to collect JCT from Japanese users, the reform imposes new collection rules. Digital platforms with transaction volumes of JPY 5 billion or more between offshore developers and Japanese users are now responsible for collecting and remitting JCT on behalf of these developers.
The 2024 Tax Reform expands the JCT obligations for foreign business operators, including those not previously subject to such taxation.
Foreign companies planning to enter the Japanese market and digital platforms serving Japanese users must evaluate how these changes will affect their operations.
These reforms reflect Japan’s efforts to adapt its tax framework to the evolving digital economy and ensure fair taxation across borders.
Businesses should proactively assess their compliance obligations to mitigate potential risks and ensure continued success in the Japanese market.
If you have any queries about this article on JCT Reform Proposals, or other Japanese tax matters, then please get in touch.
Italy’s Value Added Tax (VAT) regulations regarding residential property appear on the brink of a significant change.
Currently, rental income from residential properties generally enjoys a VAT exemption.
This includes scenarios such as social housing, where landlords may opt to apply VAT.
However, the Italian VAT authorities restrict the recovery of VAT on costs related to these properties, a constraint primarily aimed at entities outside the construction industry—the only sector currently allowed to reclaim input VAT on residential real estate expenses.
This longstanding policy strictly adheres to the Italian VAT law. However, it has sparked concerns about whether it is consistent with the fundamental VAT principle of neutrality, particularly given the properties’ taxable use.
This rigid approach can lead to market distortions, notably contrasting with the more flexible VAT recovery rules applied to residential properties used in the hospitality sector.
To rectify these issues, a new Legislative Decree is expected as part of an ongoing tax reform in Italy.
This decree proposes to eliminate the current restrictions on VAT recovery that are based on the cadastral classification of buildings.
The intention is to extend the principle of VAT neutrality more broadly, ensuring fair treatment across different uses of residential property.
For now, the existing regulations remain in effect: VAT on expenses for residential properties, even those opted for taxation, cannot be reclaimed.
The upcoming decree, however, promises a significant shift towards a more inclusive and neutral application of VAT rules in the residential property sector, aligning tax practices with market realities and ensuring equity among different property uses.
If you have queries about this article on the proposals for Italy to change VAT Rules on Residential Property, or tax matters in Italy more generally, then please get in touch.
The German Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) has issued detailed guidance on the new regulatory requirements for payment service providers under Section 22g of the German Value Added Tax Act (UStG).
This guidance comes in response to the need to strengthen measures against VAT fraud within the European Union.
The new rules, effective from 1 January 2024, emphasize the importance of maintaining records, reporting, and retaining information on cross-border payments.
Under the revised Section 22g UStG, payment service providers operating in Germany must keep detailed records of cross-border payments processed, provided they execute more than 25 transactions per quarter to the same payee.
These records are then transmitted to the Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt) and subsequently fed into the Central Electronic System of Payment Information (CESOP), a European database designed to monitor and analyze cross-border payment data to prevent VAT fraud.
The BMF outlines four specific obligations for providers under the new regulation:
The new rules apply to various entities, including CRR credit institutions, electronic money institutions, payment institutions, and postal giro offices that offer payment services in Germany.
The BMF clarifies that the regulation covers all payment transactions that result in the provision, transfer, or withdrawal of money, including those involving cryptocurrencies.
For a transaction to be considered cross-border under the regulation, the payer must be located in a European Union member state, while the payee could be in another EU state, an EEA country, or a third country.
Domestic payments within Germany and payments originating from third countries are not covered by these rules.
Payment service providers must submit the relevant data to the BZSt by the end of the calendar month following each quarter.
For instance, data for the first quarter should typically be submitted by the end of April.
However, the BMF has introduced a non-objection rule for the first report of 2024, extending the deadline to 31 July 2024, to allow providers adequate time to adjust to the new requirements.
Failure to adhere to the record-keeping, reporting, or retention requirements can result in fines up to EUR 5,000.
These sanctions underscore the seriousness with which the German authorities are treating compliance with these new regulations.
The BMF’s circular includes comprehensive resources such as a questionnaire focusing on the implementation details and a guidance paper that summarizes the GloBE Model Rules along with its commentary and administrative guidance.
These documents are designed to help payment service providers understand and implement the required changes effectively.
The implementation of these new regulations marks a significant step in Germany’s efforts to combat VAT fraud.
By ensuring that payment service providers maintain accurate records and report cross-border payment activities, the BMF aims to create a more transparent and secure financial environment.
Payment service providers are encouraged to review these new regulations closely, establish appropriate compliance mechanisms, and maintain diligent records to avoid penalties.
If you have any queries about these New Rules for Payment Service Providers, or German tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.