Tax Professional usually responds in minutes

Our tax advisers are all verified

Unlimited follow-up questions

  • Sign in
  • ARTICLE - Explainer

    FATCA v CRS

    07 Apr

    FATCA v CRS – Introduction

    FATCA and CRS are often mentioned in the same breath, but they aren’t identical twins.

    They’re more like transatlantic cousins.

    Both were born out of the post-financial-crisis push for tax transparency, and both involve the exchange of financial account information.

    But their origins, scope, and enforcement mechanisms differ considerably.

    The Basics

    FATCA is a US law.

    It requires foreign financial institutions to report information about US taxpayers to the US IRS.

    CRS, by contrast, is a global framework developed by the OECD.

    It enables participating countries to share information with each other about their residents’ overseas financial assets.

    Enforcement Muscle

    FATCA has sharp teeth.

    If a foreign institution doesn’t comply, it risks a 30% withholding tax on US-sourced income.

    CRS doesn’t impose penalties directly – enforcement is left to participating jurisdictions. It’s a bit more carrot, a bit less stick.

    Who’s in Scope?

    FATCA applies to US persons: citizens, residents, and entities with substantial US ownership.

    CRS casts a wider net.

    It applies to anyone holding financial accounts outside their country of tax residence, no matter their nationality.

    How the Data Flows

    FATCA often works through intergovernmental agreements (IGAs), where local authorities collect and transmit the information to the IRS.

    CRS is multilateral and reciprocal: tax authorities both send and receive data under standardised protocols.

    Key Differences at a Glance

    Feature FATCA CRS
    Origin US law (2010) OECD initiative (2014)
    Scope US taxpayers All tax residents
    Reporting To US IRS To home jurisdiction tax authority
    Penalties 30% withholding Local enforcement only
    Data Exchange Mostly one-way Reciprocal

    FATCA v CRS – Conclusion

    Both FATCA and CRS have transformed the global tax landscape.

    FATCA fired the first shot; CRS followed up with a coordinated global response.

    For advisers and clients alike, understanding the nuances between the two is essential to staying compliant and informed.

    Final Thoughts

    If you have any queries about this article on FATCA v CRS, or tax matters in your country or internationally then please get in touch.

    Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ut semper risus. Fusce ac pharetra sem. Praesent vitae eros a quam fermentum dignissim.

    MR BLAKEFIELD. REGAL CAPITAL. FLORIDA.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ut semper risus. Fusce ac pharetra sem. Praesent vitae eros a quam fermentum dignissim.

    MR BLAKEFIELD. REGAL CAPITAL. FLORIDA.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ut semper risus. Fusce ac pharetra sem. Praesent vitae eros a quam fermentum dignissim.

    MR BLAKEFIELD. REGAL CAPITAL. FLORIDA.

    1/3

    Contact us

    If you’re having any problems with your membership, account, or just generally loving Tax Natives. Drop us a line here and we’ll get back to you.

    Contact

    We collect personal information when you enquire about our services. We will use this information to provide the services requested, maintain records and, if you agree below, to send you marketing information. We will not share your infromation for marketing purposes with any other companies. For more information explaining how we use your information please see our Privacy Policy(Required)