Tax Professional usually responds in minutes

Our tax advisers are all verified

Unlimited follow-up questions

  • Sign in
  • Tag Archive: BEPS

    1. Global Minimum Tax Implementation Progresses

      Leave a Comment

      Global Minimum Tax Implementation – Introduction

      The global minimum tax is one of the most significant international tax reforms in decades.

      Spearheaded by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the idea is to ensure that large multinational companies pay a minimum level of tax no matter where they are based.

      This avoids a race to the bottom, where countries compete to offer the lowest corporate tax rates.

      In recent days, momentum has been building as several countries progress towards implementing this tax reform.

      What is the Global Minimum Tax?

      The global minimum tax sets a floor of 15% for corporate taxation.

      It targets companies with annual revenues above €750 million and seeks to prevent profit-shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.

      Under this framework, if a company pays less than 15% tax in one country, other countries can top up the tax to ensure the minimum rate is met.

      Recent Developments

      In the last 24 hours, finance ministries across Europe, Asia, and North America have released updates on their plans to adopt the minimum tax by the 2025 deadline.

      Germany and Japan have already passed legislation. Canada, the UK, and Australia have published consultation papers or draft legislation.

      The European Union previously agreed a directive for member states to adopt the rules.

      There are still some hurdles. For instance, implementation in the United States has been politically contentious.

      However, many countries are pushing forward regardless, recognising the global shift towards fairness and transparency in taxation.

      Why Does It Matter?

      The reform is designed to create a level playing field.

      For years, tech giants and global brands have paid minimal taxes in the countries where they operate, using complex structures and tax havens.

      The global minimum tax could yield billions in additional tax revenue for governments worldwide.

      It also discourages the creation of artificial business structures solely for tax reasons.

      Concerns and Criticisms

      Some critics argue that 15% is still too low and may legitimise tax avoidance rather than stop it.

      Others worry about the compliance burden, especially for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions.

      There are also concerns from smaller, low-tax countries that rely on competitive tax rates to attract investment.

      Global Minimum Tax – Conclusion

      The global minimum tax marks a shift in how we think about corporate taxation.

      It’s no longer just a national issue but a global one.

      While challenges remain, the recent wave of implementation activity shows that change is truly underway.

      Final thoughts

      If you have any queries about this article on global minimum tax, or tax matters in International then please get in touch.

      Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in International and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.

    2. Global Tax Reform and Ireland

      Leave a Comment

      Global Tax Reform and Ireland – Introduction

      Ireland has long been a magnet for multinational companies.

      With its 12.5% corporate tax rate, English-speaking workforce, and EU membership, it became home to the European headquarters of major tech giants like Apple, Google, and Meta.

      But global tax reform – particularly the OECD’s minimum tax initiative – is changing the rules of the game.

      What does this mean for Ireland’s economy and its future as a hub for international business?

      Ireland and the 12.5% Rate

      For over two decades, Ireland’s 12.5% corporation tax rate has been a key pillar of its economic policy.

      It attracted foreign direct investment (FDI), created tens of thousands of jobs, and turned Dublin into a global business centre.

      But critics argued that it also allowed companies to shift profits into Ireland, reducing their global tax bills and depriving other countries of revenue.

      The OECD Global Minimum Tax

      In 2021, over 130 countries – including Ireland – agreed to implement a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% on large multinational companies (those with global revenues over €750 million).

      This is known as Pillar Two of the OECD’s global tax agreement.

      Ireland initially resisted the change, concerned it would reduce its competitive edge. But after securing a carve-out that allows the rate to remain at 12.5% for smaller companies, Ireland signed up.

      What’s Changing in Ireland?

      From 2024, Ireland will apply the 15% minimum tax to large multinationals operating there.

      This means that even if a company benefits from local incentives or deductions that lower its effective tax rate, a “top-up” tax will apply if the global rate falls below 15%.

      This change is highly significant for Ireland. While the government expects the country to remain attractive – due to its talent, EU access, and stable legal system – some economists warn that the golden era of FDI-driven growth may cool slightly.

      In response, the Irish government is focusing more on long-term, sustainable growth through infrastructure, education, and innovation, rather than relying purely on tax competitiveness.

      What Does This Mean for Businesses?

      For large companies already in Ireland, the tax bill is likely to rise slightly, especially if they were benefiting from preferential structures.

      But for small and medium-sized businesses — including many Irish companies — the 12.5% rate continues to apply.

      That means Ireland still offers one of the most attractive environments for smaller international businesses looking for an EU base.

      Global Tax Reform and Ireland – Conclusion

      Ireland’s place in the global tax landscape is evolving. It remains a strong destination for business, but the days of ultra-low tax planning through Ireland are being replaced by a more level playing field. As the OECD’s global tax framework beds in, Ireland’s future success will depend on more than just its tax rate — and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

      Final thoughts

      If you have any queries about this article on corporate tax reform, or tax matters in Ireland then please get in touch.


      Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Ireland and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.

    3. The Global Minimum Tax Deal Under Pressure – Is the US Holding It Back?

      Leave a Comment

      Global Minimum Tax Deal Under Pressure – Introduction

      Just when the world thought it was on the cusp of a global tax breakthrough, cracks are beginning to show.

      The landmark OECD agreement aimed at overhauling how multinational companies are taxed is facing renewed opposition – and much of the resistance is coming from the United States.

      This could have major implications for how, when, and even if the deal is implemented.

      What Is the Global Tax Deal?

      The OECD’s two-pillar framework was designed to tackle tax avoidance and ensure large multinationals pay a fairer share of tax, wherever they operate.

      Pillar One reallocates taxing rights so market countries can tax a portion of profits.

      Pillar Two introduces a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% for companies with annual revenues above €750 million.

      Over 135 countries, including the US, have committed in principle. But turning that agreement into domestic law is proving to be the real challenge.

      Why Is the US Wavering?

      Although the Biden administration supported the OECD framework, political realities have changed.

      With a divided Congress and strong Republican opposition, passing necessary legislation has become difficult.

      Critics in the US argue that the global minimum tax could hurt American competitiveness by effectively outsourcing tax sovereignty.

      There’s also concern that other countries are implementing Pillar Two but dragging their feet on Pillar One – potentially putting US firms at a disadvantage.

      Impact on Global Progress

      US hesitancy could derail the entire project.

      Other countries, particularly in the EU and Asia, are moving forward with minimum tax rules.

      If the US doesn’t follow suit, it undermines the whole concept of a level playing field.

      There’s also a risk that disputes over digital taxes, which Pillar One was supposed to resolve, could flare up again if countries lose patience with the OECD timetable.

      What Happens Next?

      All eyes are now on the US Congress and upcoming elections.

      Without US implementation, the deal lacks weight — and countries may return to unilateral measures like digital services taxes.

      This would be a setback for international cooperation and tax certainty.

      Global Minimum Tax Deal – Conclusion

      The global tax deal was a diplomatic achievement, but its future is far from guaranteed.

      If the US backs away or delays indefinitely, other countries may rethink their own commitments — and the dream of a fairer global tax system could stall once more.

      Final thoughts

      If you have any queries about this article on the global minimum tax, or tax matters in the United States then please get in touch.

      Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.

    4. What is Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR)?

      Leave a Comment

      Introduction: What is Country by Country Reporting (CbCR)?

      Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) is a tax transparency measure introduced by the OECD as part of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative.

      CbCR requires large multinational companies to report detailed information about their operations, profits, and taxes paid in each country where they do business.

      This information is then shared with tax authorities to help them detect tax avoidance practices, such as profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.

      How Does CbCR Work?

      CbCR applies to multinational companies with global revenues of more than €750 million.

      These companies must file an annual CbCR report that provides a breakdown of their income, profits, taxes paid, and other economic activities in each country where they operate.

      For example, if a company has subsidiaries in 10 different countries, it must provide information on how much revenue each subsidiary earns, how much profit it makes, and how much tax it pays in each country.

      This level of detail helps tax authorities identify where a company might be shifting profits to avoid taxes.

      Why Was CbCR Introduced?

      as introduced as part of the OECD’s effort to tackle tax avoidance by multinational companies.

      Before CbCR, it was difficult for tax authorities to see the full picture of a company’s global operations.

      By requiring companies to disclose their activities on a country-by-country basis, CbCR gives tax authorities the information they need to detect tax avoidance schemes.

      This reporting helps ensure that multinational companies are paying their fair share of taxes in the countries where they actually do business, rather than shifting profits to tax havens.

      Conclusion: Country by Country Reporting

      Country-by-Country Reporting is a critical tool for improving tax transparency and combating tax avoidance.

      By requiring large multinational companies to report detailed information about their global operations,

      CbCR helps tax authorities ensure that companies are paying their fair share of taxes and operating in a fair and transparent manner.

      Final thoughts

      If you have any queries about this article – What is country by country reporting? – then please do get in touch.

       

    5. OECD Releases Global Minimum Tax Guidelines

      Leave a Comment

      OECD’s global minimum tax guidelines – Introduction

      The OECD has published new technical guidelines to assist countries in implementing the global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%.

      This initiative aims to ensure that multinational corporations contribute a fair share of taxes, regardless of where they operate.

      Key Features of the Guidelines

      The technical guidance addresses several challenges, including calculating effective tax rates, identifying low-tax jurisdictions, and handling cross-border complexities.

      It also provides a framework for dispute resolution between nations.

      Implications for Multinational Corporations

      The guidelines will require multinationals to reassess their tax strategies, particularly those involving low-tax jurisdictions.

      Compliance costs are expected to rise, but the rules aim to create a more level playing field globally.

      Challenges in Implementation

      Countries with tax-friendly regimes may resist adopting these guidelines, fearing a loss of competitiveness.

      Additionally, differing interpretations of the rules could lead to disputes between jurisdictions.

      OECD’s global minimum tax guidelines – Conclusion

      The OECD’s technical guidance is a significant step towards implementing a global minimum tax. While challenges remain, this initiative represents a milestone in international tax cooperation.

      Final Thoughts

      If you have any queries about this article on OECD’s global minimum tax guidelines, or tax matters in OECD member states, then please get in touch.

      Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in OECD member states and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then there is more information on membership here.

    6. Ireland Progresses New Participation Exemption: What It Means for Foreign Investors

      Leave a Comment

      Ireland Progresses New Participation Exemption: Introduction

      A participation exemption is a key tax mechanism designed to avoid double taxation on income earned from foreign subsidiaries.

      It allows companies to receive dividends from their foreign investments without being taxed again in the home country.

      This exemption is an attractive feature for businesses with a multinational presence, as it encourages cross-border investments while eliminating the risk of double taxation.

      Ireland, already known for its business-friendly tax environment, is introducing a new participation exemption as part of its tax reforms.

      This is expected to enhance its appeal to multinational companies and investors looking for efficient tax structures within the EU.

      Ireland’s New Participation Exemption: An Overview

      Ireland’s low corporate tax rate of 12.5% has long made it a popular choice for multinationals.

      Now, with the introduction of a participation exemption, Ireland is aligning itself with other European countries that already offer similar incentives.

      The exemption allows Irish-based companies to receive dividends and capital gains from foreign subsidiaries without paying additional tax in Ireland, provided the subsidiary meets certain conditions.

      These conditions generally require the subsidiary to be based in a country with which Ireland has a tax treaty and for the Irish company to hold at least a 5% ownership stake in the subsidiary.

      This is particularly advantageous for companies looking to repatriate profits from their overseas operations, as they can now do so without incurring a tax burden in Ireland.

      How It Works: Conditions and Benefits

      The new participation exemption applies under specific conditions, as follows:

      • Qualifying Subsidiaries: The subsidiary must be located in a country that has a tax treaty with Ireland.
      • Ownership Threshold: The Irish parent company must own at least 5% of the subsidiary’s shares.
      • Nature of Income: The income must be from qualifying dividends or capital gains related to the sale of shares in the foreign subsidiary.

      This new rule makes Ireland a more attractive location for holding companies that manage international subsidiaries, further boosting its competitiveness in the global tax landscape.

      Why This Matters: Attracting Foreign Investments

      Ireland’s participation exemption is expected to attract even more foreign direct investment, particularly from multinationals looking for an efficient tax regime within the EU.

      By eliminating the risk of double taxation on foreign earnings, Ireland offers a compelling proposition for companies with global operations.

      Furthermore, this new tax policy could encourage companies to restructure their international holdings to take advantage of Ireland’s favourable tax regime.

      As many businesses seek alternatives to the UK post-Brexit, Ireland’s new participation exemption strengthens its position as a key financial hub within the EU.

      Challenges and Global Tax Trends

      While the participation exemption is a welcome addition to Ireland’s tax policies, it will need to be balanced with the global trend towards higher corporate tax transparency and compliance.

      For instance, the OECD’s Pillar 2 of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative introduces a global minimum tax of 15%, which could limit the effectiveness of Ireland’s low-tax regime.

      Moreover, Ireland’s tax policies have been scrutinised by the European Union in the past, especially regarding state aid and preferential treatment of multinationals.

      The participation exemption, while beneficial, will need to comply with these international regulations.

      Ireland Progresses New Participation Exemption – Conclusion

      Ireland’s introduction of a participation exemption is a strategic move that will likely increase its appeal as a destination for multinational companies.

      By offering a tax-efficient way to manage foreign earnings, Ireland positions itself as a leading hub for international investments.

      However, companies will need to ensure that they remain compliant with evolving global tax standards while taking advantage of this new opportunity.

      Final thoughts

      For more information about Ireland Progresses New Participation Exemption, or Irish tax matters more generally, then please get in touch.

    7. Singapore two pillar solution or BEPS 2.0

      Leave a Comment

      Singapore two pillar solution – Introduction

      The global wave of the two-pillar solution to address base erosion and profit shifting (which all the cool kids are calling BEPS 2.0) has reached Singapore. 

      Pillar talk

      Singapore will implement Pillar 2 of BEPS 2.0 in 2025, which will require multinational enterprises (MNEs) with local operations to top up their effective tax rate (ETR) in Singapore to 15%. 

      Many MNEs with Singapore operations currently benefit from tax incentives and enjoy an ETR lower than the upcoming 15%. 

      It is unclear whether existing incentives and exemptions will continue to apply, and whether Singapore’s territorial basis of taxation will change. 

      As the full effects of BEPS 2.0 are expected to be felt in 2025 or later, Singapore has chosen a cautious approach to delay implementation until then, giving itself time and a chance to learn from the experiences of other countries before determining the best way forward.

      Pillar fight

      The implementation of Pillar 2 is crucial for Singapore, as it is an opportunity to increase revenue and fortify its fiscal position. 

      Under Pillar 1, Singapore is expected to lose revenue when profits are reallocated to the countries where markets are located. With a small domestic market, Singapore has to give up taxing rights to bigger markets and receives very little in return. 

      However, Pillar 2 presents a chance for Singapore to generate more corporate tax revenue, assuming that existing economic activities are retained.

      The key to Singapore’s continued success is staying competitive in attracting and retaining investments. 

      The use of tax incentives may become obsolete or significantly compromised once the effects of BEPS 2.0 are felt. 

      Singapore has signaled that it will seek to reinvest and strengthen non-tax factors to remain competitive. 

      Whatever additional corporate tax revenue can be generated from BEPS 2.0 will be reinvested to maintain and enhance its competitiveness. Together with the intended implementation of Pillar 2, Singapore will also review and update its broader suite of industry development schemes.

      A lack of detail?

      The lack of details and the delayed implementation of Pillar 2 suggest that policymakers are looking for more information to guide their decisions. If there are additional delays internationally, it is likely that Singapore will adjust its implementation timeline. 

      Singapore has assured companies that it will continue to engage them and give them sufficient notice ahead of any changes to its tax rules or schemes.

      Singapore two pillar solution – Conclusion

      MNEs that may be affected should actively participate in public consultation exercises before the implementation of Pillar 2 in 2025. 

      Those who currently benefit from an existing tax incentive should consider reaching out early to the relevant authorities if they are concerned about the implications of the new rules.

      If you have any queries relating to the Singapore two pillar solution, or Singaporean tax matters more generally, then please do not hesitate to get in touch.

      The content of this article is provided for educational and information purposes only. It is not intended, and should not be construed, as tax or legal advice. We recommend you seek formal tax and legal advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the contents of this article.