US States Consider Abolishing Property Taxes – Introduction
A growing movement in several US states is calling for the abolition of property taxes, arguing that homeowners should not have to “pay rent” to the government just to live in their own homes.
The proposal has gained traction among conservatives and libertarians who argue that property taxes unfairly penalize ownership, particularly for retirees and low-income individuals.
The push for reform is most visible in Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Hampshire, where lawmakers are considering alternatives, including higher sales taxes or new revenue sources to offset the loss of property tax income.
However, opponents argue that eliminating property taxes would cripple local governments, which rely heavily on this revenue to fund schools, emergency services, and infrastructure.
The Argument for Abolition
Proponents of abolishing property taxes argue that:
- Property taxes disproportionately affect retirees who may have paid off their homes but still face rising tax bills.
- The tax system is regressive, as lower-income homeowners often pay a higher percentage of their income in property tax compared to wealthier individuals.
- It undermines true ownership, as people effectively pay the government annually for the right to live in a home they supposedly own.
Some legislators, such as Pennsylvania Representative Frank Ryan, have suggested replacing property tax revenue with higher sales taxes or a state-wide income tax surcharge.
This shift, they argue, would be fairer and more predictable than property taxes, which fluctuate based on real estate assessments and market conditions.
In Texas, a state with no income tax, property taxes are the primary source of local government funding.
Conservative lawmakers have pushed for a gradual phase-out of property taxes, replacing them with consumption-based taxes.
The Challenges of Property Tax Abolition
Opponents of the proposal argue that eliminating property taxes would lead to:
- Severe budget shortfalls for local governments and school districts.
- A shift in tax burden—higher sales or income taxes could disproportionately affect the middle and working classes.
- Reduced public services, including cuts to education, road maintenance, and emergency response funding.
In Pennsylvania, for example, nearly 50% of school district funding comes from property taxes. Replacing this revenue would require a massive increase in other forms of taxation.
The state’s HB 900 proposal includes a broad sales tax increase, but this has faced opposition from businesses and low-income advocates.
Similarly, in New Hampshire, which has no state income tax, property taxes are the primary revenue source. Any repeal would necessitate a fundamental restructuring of how local services are funded.
Some states, like Florida and Tennessee, have instead opted for property tax caps, limiting how much taxes can rise annually rather than eliminating them altogether.
US States Consider Abolishing Property Taxes – Conclusion
The debate over property taxes in the US is deeply ideological, pitting homeownership rights against the need to fund essential public services.
While the idea of eliminating property taxes is politically appealing, the reality of replacing this revenue is complex and contentious.
Some states may experiment with gradual reductions or alternative funding mechanisms, but a complete abolition remains an uphill battle due to the heavy reliance of local governments on this tax stream.
Final Thoughts
If you have any queries about this article on property tax reform in the US, or tax matters in any US state, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in the US and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.