CJEU AG Deems Spain’s Regional Hydrocarbon Tax Non-Compliant – Introduction
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Advocate General, Athanasios Rantos, has delivered an opinion suggesting that Spain’s regional variation of the Special Tax on Hydrocarbons (STH), effective between 2013 and 2018, contradicts the EU Energy Taxation Directive.
This position could significantly influence the forthcoming CJEU judgment, potentially impacting how energy products are taxed across regions within Member States.
Background of the Special Tax on Hydrocarbons
The STH, an excise duty levied on mineral oil products’ transfer to purchasers, is aimed at taxing the ownership transfer from tax warehouse holders to buyers.
This duty, while ensuring tax collection from the purchaser by the warehouse holder, prohibits the latter from transferring the tax burden to customers, albeit allowing its consideration in product pricing.
Governed by the Law 38/1992 on excise duties, the STH’s harmonization with EU law, specifically with Directive 2003/96/EC, is crucial for its legality.
Controversy and Legal Challenge
The introduction of an “Autonomous Community Tranche” allowing regions to apply supplementary tax brackets sparked legal debate, leading to varying tax levels across Spain based on purchase locations.
Questions arose regarding the tranche’s alignment with Directive 2003/96, especially Article 5, which discusses tax bracket uniformity within Member States.
Legal challenges ensued, prompting a referral to the CJEU for clarity on whether such regional tax brackets comply with EU directives.
Advocate General’s Opinion
Advocate General Rantos argued that Member States cannot implement regional excise duty variations without Council authorization, which Spain did not obtain.
Emphasizing the internal market’s integrity and the free movement of goods, Rantos highlighted that differentiated tax tranches could fragment the market, opposing Directive 2003/96’s objectives.
Furthermore, he noted that the Autonomous Community Tranche lacks a specific purpose, thereby not satisfying Directive 2008/118 conditions.
The principle of equal treatment, according to Rantos, further invalidates the regional tax differences within Spain.
Implications and Future Outlook
Should the CJEU’s final decision align with the Advocate General’s opinion, it could echo the 2014 ruling against Spain’s “Céntimo Sanitario,” leading to the regional tax’s annulment.
This outcome would necessitate a mechanism for affected taxpayers to claim refunds, considering the tax’s non-transferable nature and the need to demonstrate that the tax burden wasn’t passed on.
CJEU AG Deems Spain’s Regional Hydrocarbon Tax Non-Compliant – Conclusion
The CJEU’s forthcoming judgment and its retrospective effect could significantly influence Spain’s taxation landscape, potentially mandating refunds to taxpayers who bore the STH without lawful basis.
As the legal community and taxpayers await the CJEU’s definitive ruling, the Advocate General’s stance marks a critical step towards resolving the dispute over Spain’s regional hydrocarbon taxation.
Final thoughts
If you have any queries about this article, or Spanish taxes in general, then please get in touch.