Tax Professional usually responds in minutes
Our tax advisers are all verified
Unlimited follow-up questions
A dispute is brewing between the United States and Canada over the latter’s plans to introduce a Digital Services Tax (DST).
The DST is aimed at taxing large technology companies that generate significant revenue from Canadian users but currently pay little tax in the country.
The U.S. has expressed concerns that the tax unfairly targets American companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, and has threatened to retaliate with tariffs on Canadian goods if the DST is implemented.
In this article, we’ll explore the details of the DST, why the US is opposed to it, and what this could mean for international trade relations.
The Digital Services Tax is a tax on the revenue that large tech companies earn from providing digital services, such as social media, online advertising, and e-commerce platforms.
Canada’s proposed DST would impose a 3% tax on the revenue these companies generate from Canadian users.
The tax would apply to companies with global revenues of more than CAD 1 billion and at least CAD 40 million in Canadian revenue.
The tax is designed to ensure that digital companies, many of which are based in the U.S., pay a fair share of tax on the profits they earn from Canadian users.
Currently, many of these companies can shift their profits to low-tax jurisdictions, allowing them to avoid paying significant taxes in Canada.
The United States has raised concerns that the DST unfairly targets American tech companies, which dominate the global digital economy.
The U.S. government argues that the tax is discriminatory because it primarily affects American companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook, while Canadian companies and companies from other countries are largely unaffected.
In response to Canada’s plans, the U.S. has threatened to impose tariffs on Canadian exports, which could affect key industries such as aluminum, steel, and agriculture.
The U.S. has argued that international tax issues should be addressed through multilateral agreements, such as the OECD’s global tax framework, rather than unilateral measures like the DST.
The dispute between the U.S. and Canada is ongoing, and both sides are still in talks to resolve the issue.
However, if Canada moves forward with the DST, the U.S. could retaliate with tariffs, leading to a potential trade war between the two countries.
This would have significant economic consequences for both countries, particularly for Canadian exporters who rely on the U.S. market.
In the meantime, many other countries, including France and Italy, have also introduced digital services taxes, and the US has taken a similar stance against those measures.
The outcome of the US-Canada dispute could have broader implications for how digital companies are taxed around the world.
Canada’s proposed Digital Services Tax has sparked a heated dispute with the United States, which views the tax as unfairly targeting American tech companies.
While the two countries continue to negotiate, the potential for tariffs and trade retaliation looms large.
If you have any queries about this article on Canada’s Digital Services Tax, or tax matters in Canada or the United States, then please get in touch.
Alternatively, if you are a tax adviser in Canada or the United States and would be interested in sharing your knowledge and becoming a tax native, then please get in touch. There is more information on membership here.
Singapore has become a global hub for startups and entrepreneurs due to its business-friendly environment, strategic location, and supportive tax policies.
To further boost the growth of new businesses, Singapore offers several tax relief programs designed to help startups during their early years.
These tax reliefs make it easier for entrepreneurs to focus on growing their businesses without worrying about excessive tax burdens.
Singapore has introduced several tax relief programs specifically aimed at newly incorporated companies. The two main tax relief schemes are:
To qualify for the Startup Tax Exemption (SUTE) scheme, companies must meet certain conditions:
It’s also important to note that the SUTE scheme does not apply to companies engaging in certain industries, such as property development or investment holding.
The Partial Tax Exemption (PTE) scheme, however, is open to all companies, regardless of their size or shareholders, making it a flexible option for businesses that don’t qualify for the SUTE scheme.
Starting a business often involves significant financial challenges, especially during the first few years.
These tax relief schemes help reduce the tax burden on startups, allowing them to reinvest their profits back into the business.
This can be particularly beneficial for tech startups, which often require significant capital for research and development (R&D) before they start generating profits.
By offering tax relief, Singapore encourages innovation and entrepreneurship, helping businesses grow faster and contribute to the country’s economy.
Singapore’s tax relief programs for startups provide a strong incentive for entrepreneurs to set up their businesses in the country.
The Startup Tax Exemption and Partial Tax Exemption schemes reduce the financial burden on new companies, allowing them to focus on growth and innovation.
For entrepreneurs looking to launch a business in Asia, Singapore’s supportive tax environment, combined with its strategic location and infrastructure, makes it an ideal place to start and grow a business.
If you have any queries about this article on Singapore’s Tax Relief for Startups, or tax matters in Singapore at all, then please get in touch.
Value Added Tax (VAT) is a type of tax that’s added to most goods and services that are sold.
In many countries, businesses collect VAT from their customers and then pay it to the government.
Recently, Switzerland decided to require online platforms to collect VAT on behalf of sellers, similar to rules in the European Union.
Switzerland is following the lead of the EU in making sure that online platforms like Amazon and eBay collect VAT on the goods sold by independent sellers.
Before this rule, it was up to the sellers themselves to collect and pay the VAT. However, not all sellers complied, and this led to lost tax revenue.
By shifting the responsibility to platforms, Switzerland aims to make sure that VAT is properly collected and paid. This helps ensure a fairer tax system and increases government revenue.
Under the new rule, if an online platform facilitates a sale between a Swiss buyer and an independent seller, the platform must collect VAT on behalf of the seller and pay it to the Swiss government.
This applies to both Swiss-based sellers and sellers from other countries selling to Swiss customers.
This change is important because it makes it harder for sellers to avoid paying VAT. It also levels the playing field for Swiss businesses, which have always had to collect and pay VAT on their sales.
For sellers, this rule means they no longer have to worry about collecting VAT themselves. However, it also means they may have to adjust their prices to include the VAT collected by the platform.
For online platforms, this rule adds extra work, as they need to update their systems to comply with the new VAT requirements.
However, platforms are used to these types of rules, especially in the EU, so most should be able to adjust without too much difficulty.
Switzerland’s new VAT rule for online platforms is a step towards stronger tax compliance.
By requiring platforms to collect VAT, Switzerland ensures that sellers pay their fair share of taxes while making the system simpler for both businesses and the government.
Final thoughts
If you have any queries about this article, Swiss Platforms Required to Collect VAT from Online Sellers, or tax matters in Switzerland more generally, then please get in touch.
A digital services tax (DST) is a tax on revenue generated by large tech companies from online services, such as advertising and data collection.
Many countries have introduced DSTs in recent years to ensure that big tech companies, like Google and Facebook, pay their fair share of taxes in the countries where they operate.
Canada recently enacted its own Digital Services Tax Act, which imposes a 3% tax on revenue earned by large tech companies from digital services provided to Canadian users.
Canada introduced the Digital Services Tax because it felt that big tech companies were not paying enough tax in Canada.
These companies often base their operations in low-tax countries but generate significant revenue from Canadian users.
By introducing the DST, Canada hopes to ensure that these companies contribute to the Canadian economy.
The DST applies to companies with global revenues of more than $1 billion and Canadian revenues of more than $40 million.
The tax is levied on revenue from online advertising, data collection, and digital platforms that allow users to interact, such as social media networks.
Under the new law, large tech companies must pay a 3% tax on the revenue they generate from Canadian users.
This tax is calculated based on the company’s total global revenue and the proportion of that revenue earned in Canada.
For example, if a company earns $100 million in revenue from Canadian users, it would owe $3 million in DST to the Canadian government.
This tax is separate from the company’s regular corporate tax obligations.
The introduction of the DST has been controversial, particularly among big tech companies.
Many of these companies argue that they already pay corporate taxes in the countries where they are based and that the DST amounts to double taxation.
Some companies have even threatened to pass the cost of the tax on to Canadian users by raising prices for their services.
Despite these concerns, Canada has pushed ahead with the tax, arguing that it is necessary to ensure that tech companies contribute their fair share to the Canadian economy.
Canada’s Digital Services Tax is part of a global trend towards taxing digital services.
While it has been met with resistance from tech companies, the tax is expected to generate significant revenue for the Canadian government.
For tech companies, this means they will need to adapt to a new era of taxation that ensures they pay their fair share in the countries where they operate.
If you have any queries about this article on Canada Enacts Digital Services Tax Act, or tax matters in Canada more generally, then please get in touch.
On June 23, 2023, the Digital Games Tax Offset (DGTO) became law in Australia.
This new measure aims to support eligible video game developers by providing a 30% refundable tax offset for qualifying Australian development expenditure.
But what does this mean in practical terms?
A tax offset typically reduces the amount of tax a company owes.
In the case of the DGTO, it’s a refundable offset, meaning if your tax payable is less than the offset amount, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will refund the difference.
For example, if you owe $500 in tax but have a $1000 offset, you’ll receive a $500 tax refund.
This mechanism effectively allows the government to contribute to and boost the development budget of a video game, provided the company has already spent the money.
To claim the DGTO, the following criteria must be met:
The development expenditure must be Australian, meaning the goods or services are acquired in Australia. This excludes expenses incurred overseas.
A company can claim up to 30% of all qualifying expenditure, with a maximum claimable amount of $20 million per year.
This cap applies across multiple games. For instance, if three games are developed with a total budget of $90 million, the maximum offset remains $20 million.
The approximate limit of a game’s budget that can be claimed is around $66.7 million.
The ATO will group related companies for the purpose of applying the cap, so developing two games from separate companies will have their expenditures added together.
Before filing an offset claim with the ATO, developers need a certificate (completion, porting, or ongoing) from the Arts Minister. This certificate verifies that all the requirements are met.
The definition of a video game under the act is broad, encompassing games in electronic form that can generate a display on:
The DGTO is likely to benefit larger developers more than indie developers.
The minimum threshold of $500,000 in development expenditure will rule out many independent studios, particularly considering the expenditures that do not qualify.
Therefore, even a game with a budget over $500,000 may not meet the criteria.
If you have any queries about this article on the Digital Games Tax Offset, or Australian tax matters in general, then please get in touch.
If you have any queries about this article on New Zero Tax Rate on Photovoltaic Systems in Germany, or German tax matters in general,than please get in touch.
In a bold move to bolster its standing as a global high-tech hub, Israel recently introduced the revamped Angels Law, packed with enticing tax incentives to attract investors into its burgeoning tech sector.
The legislation, effective until the end of 2026, is a strategic successor to the original Angels Law that concluded its run in 2019.
This reinvigorated legal framework seeks to accelerate investment in Israeli high-tech startups while offering an array of tax benefits that promise to reshape the landscape of tech investments.
In order to ignite investment in high-tech startups under specific criteria, the new Angels Law delivers a tax credit as a carrot to investors who put their money into Israeli high-tech startups.
This credit is calculated by multiplying the investment amount by Israel’s applicable capital gains tax rate – a tax credit that mirrors what would have been levied had the investor sold their allocated shares within the same tax year of investment.
This is a game-changer that empowers investors to recoup a portion of their investment costs swiftly, thus paving the way for lower entry barriers to high-tech startups.
However, there’s a cap of ILS 4 million for this tax credit, and unused credit can be carried forward to future tax years.
The Angels Law introduces the concept of deducting investments in Israeli high-tech startups from capital gains realized through the sale of shares in other high-tech companies.
For this benefit to kick in, the investment must be made within 12 months before or 4 months after the shares’ sale.
By allowing investors to trim their capital gains with the investment amount, this provision optimizes the tax landscape for experienced investors, fostering a nurturing environment for their invaluable business acumen.
In an innovative twist, the Angels Law permits an Israeli high-tech company that acquires control over another local or foreign high-tech entity with a “beneficial intangible asset” to deduct the purchase cost from its “preferred technological income.”
This deduction can be claimed over five years, post-acquisition.
This shift empowers companies to manage their profitability during the early stages post-acquisition, giving time for strategic investments to mature.
Large Israeli high-tech firms often look to foreign financial institutions for funding due to restricted domestic financing options.
The new Angels Law aims to ease this burden by granting foreign financial institutions tax exemption on interest income generated from loans extended to Israeli high-tech firms.
This exemption aims to reduce the financial strain on tech firms, facilitating smoother access to essential funding from global sources.
With the clock ticking until the Angels Law’s expiration at the close of 2026, the window of opportunity for both local and foreign investors to capitalize on these lucrative tax benefits is a limited one.
Israel’s high-tech sector is now primed for an influx of investments, as startups and established tech giants alike stand to gain from these enticing incentives.
As the world watches, Israel is poised to maintain its reputation as a tech powerhouse with innovation-friendly policies that will reverberate throughout the global investment landscape.
If you would like more information about Israel’s new Angels Law or Israeli tax matters in general then please get in touch.
The content of this article is provided for educational and information purposes only. It is not intended, and should not be construed, as tax or legal advice. We recommend you seek formal tax and legal advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the contents of this article..